首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

嘉兴市大气PM2.5中金属元素污染特征、生态风险评价及来源分析
引用本文:熊传芳,张征宇,万梅,等.嘉兴市大气PM2.5中金属元素污染特征、生态风险评价及来源分析[J].环境工程技术学报,2023,13(1):96-104 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210487
作者姓名:熊传芳  张征宇  万梅  唐倩  张颖龙  杨晓霞
作者单位:1.嘉兴市生态环境应急监控与事故调查中心;;2.嘉兴市生态环境局;;3.浙江清华长三角研究院;;4.浙江省生态环境监测中心;;5.浙江省嘉兴生态环境监测中心
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFC0213804)
摘    要:

为研究嘉兴市大气PM2.5中金属元素的污染特征、生态风险和污染来源,使用嘉兴市善西超级站的24 h在线监测数据,对2019年3月1日—2020年2月29日嘉兴市大气PM2.5和其中12种金属元素(K、Ca、Fe、Zn、Mn、Cd、Pb、Cr、Ni、Ba、Cu、V)进行分析。结果表明:观测期间嘉兴市PM2.5平均浓度为30.94 μg/m3,优于GB 3095—2012《环境空气质量标准》二级标准(35 μg/m3),PM2.5浓度季节分布为冬季>春季>秋季>夏季。金属元素总浓度为1.36 μg/m3,从高到低分别为K>Fe>Zn>Ca>Mn>Pb>Ba>Cu>Cr>Ni>Cd>V,其中Fe、Zn浓度的变化受到新型冠状病毒感染疫情暴发和春节的影响。随着大气污染程度的加重,PM2.5中金属元素总浓度和各金属元素浓度都呈上升趋势,但大多数金属元素在PM2.5中的占比呈下降趋势。富集因子法表明,K、Ca、Fe、Ba、V不存在富集,Zn、Cd存在极重富集。地累积指数结果显示,Cu、Pb、Zn、Cd受到人为源的影响较大。由金属元素的生态风险指数可知,Mn、Cr、Ni存在轻微潜在生态风险,Zn、Cu、Pb、Cd的生态风险较大。通过主成分分析得出,嘉兴市PM2.5中金属元素主要来自工业源、燃煤源、交通源和自然源。



关 键 词:PM2.5   金属元素   富集因子   地累积指数   生态风险
收稿时间:2021-09-07

Pollution characteristics,ecological risk assessment and source apportionment of mental elements in PM2.5 in Jiaxing City
XIONG C F,ZHANG Z Y,WAN M,et al.Pollution characteristics, ecological risk assessment and source apportionment of mental elements in PM2.5 in Jiaxing City[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2023,13(1):96-104 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210487
Authors:XIONG Chuanfang  ZHANG Zhengyu  WAN Mei  TANG Qian  ZHANG Yinglong  YANG Xiaoxia
Affiliation:1. Jiaxing Eco-Environmental Emergency Monitoring and Accident Investigation Center;;2. Jiaxing Ecology and Environment Bureau;;3. Yangtze Delta Region Research Institute of Tsinghua University;;4. Zhejiang Eco-Environmental Monitoring Center;;5. Jiaxing Eco-Environmental Monitoring Center of Zhejiang Province
Abstract:In order to study the pollution characteristics, ecological risks and pollution sources of metal elements in PM2.5 in Jiaxing, the 24-hour online monitoring data of Shanxi (SX) site in Jiaxing City from March 1, 2019 to February 29, 2020 were collected to investigate PM2.5 and 12 metal elements (K, Ca, Fe, Zn, Mn, Cd, Pb, Cr, Ni, Ba, Cu and V) in PM2.5 samples. The results indicated that the average concentration of PM2.5 was 30.94 μg/m3 during the sampling period, which was better than the secondary concentration standard of Ambient Air Quality Standard (GB 3095-2012) (PM2.5, 35 μg/m3). PM2.5 concentrations in the samples were in the following order: winter > spring > autumn > summer. Meanwhile, the concentrations of metal elements were ranked as follows: K > Fe > Zn > Ca > Mn > Pb > Ba > Cu > Cr > Ni > Cd > V (the total concentration being 1.36 μg/m3), in which concentrations of Fe and Zn were affected by the COVID-19 outbreak and the Spring Festival. It was found that both the total metal concentration and each metal element concentration in PM2.5 increased with the pollution increasing, while the proportion of most metal elements in PM2.5 decreased. The enrichment factor (EF) method results indicated that K, Ca, Fe, Ba and V were considered almost with no elements enrichment, while Zn and Cd showed extremely heavy enrichment. The geoaccumulation index (Igeo) results implied that Cu, Pb, Zn and Cd were strongly influenced by anthropogenic activities. In addition, the ecological risk index (Ei) results of mental elements indicated that Mn, Cr and Ni showed slight ecological risk, and Zn, Cu, Pb and Cd showed high ecological risk. In addition, the principal component analysis indicated that industrial processes, coal combustion, vehicle traffic and crustal sources were the main sources of these metal elements in PM2.5 in Jiaxing City.
Keywords:PM2.5<  sub>  mental elements  enrichment factor  geoaccumulation index  ecological risk
点击此处可从《环境工程技术学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境工程技术学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号