首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

厌氧消化液不同投加方式对AOA-SBR系统处理效果的影响
引用本文:李夕耀,彭永臻,何岳兰,马斌,赵骥. 厌氧消化液不同投加方式对AOA-SBR系统处理效果的影响[J]. 环境科学研究, 2016, 29(5): 746-752
作者姓名:李夕耀  彭永臻  何岳兰  马斌  赵骥
作者单位:北京市污水脱氮除磷处理与过程控制工程技术研究中心, 北京市水质科学与水环境恢复工程重点实验室, 北京工业大学环境与能源工程学院, 北京 100124
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(51478013);北京市教育委员会资助项目
摘    要:为研究厌氧消化液的不同投加方式对AOA-SBR(厌氧/好氧/缺氧序批式反应器)系统处理效果的影响,在温度为20.0 ℃、生活污水与厌氧消化液体积比为24∶1、污泥中AOB(氨氧化菌)所占比例为7.34%条件下,考察了不投加、厌氧阶段开始一次性投加、好氧阶段开始一次性投加和好氧阶段分次投加等6种厌氧消化液投加方式(分别记为SBR-a、SBR-b、SBR-c、SBR-d、SBR-e、SBR-f)下AOA-SBR系统中SCODCr(溶解性化学需氧量)、PO43--P、NH4+-N的处理特性. 结果表明:厌氧消化液的投加方式对SCODCr的去除基本没有影响,但厌氧消化液的投加使系统中PLR(PO43--P进水容积负荷)提高了104.88%,导致除SBR-a外各试验组出水ρ(PO43--P)均大于2.0 mg/L,为AOA-SBR处理生活污水与厌氧消化液联合废水的主要限制因素. SBR-b~SBR-f的SNPR(比亚硝酸盐生成速率)均高于SBR-a,表明厌氧消化液的添加有助于稳定污水短程硝化. 研究显示,厌氧开始阶段一次投加厌氧消化液(SBR-b)对系统脱氮效果影响最小,为最佳进水方式,此时SAUR(比氨氧化速率)为0.168 0 g/(g·d),SNPR(比亚硝酸盐产生速率)为0.136 3 g/(g·d),SND(同步硝化反硝化)作用率为26.64%. 

关 键 词:厌氧消化上清液   实际生活污水   生物脱氮   短程硝化   序批式反应器
收稿时间:2015-06-24
修稿时间:2016-02-16

Effects of Different Feeding Modes of Anaerobic Digestion Supernatant on AOA-SBR Efficacy
LI Xiyao,PENG Yongzhen,HE Yuelan,MA Bin and ZHAO Ji. Effects of Different Feeding Modes of Anaerobic Digestion Supernatant on AOA-SBR Efficacy[J]. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2016, 29(5): 746-752
Authors:LI Xiyao  PENG Yongzhen  HE Yuelan  MA Bin  ZHAO Ji
Affiliation:Engineering Research Center of Beijing, Key Laboratory of Beijing for Water Quality Science and Water Environment Recovery Engineering, College of Environmental and Energy Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
Abstract:The effects of six feeding modes in treating anaerobic digester (AD) supernatant and domestic sewage were investigated using shortcut nitrification sequencing batch reactor (SBR) by anaerobic-aerobic-anoxic (AOA) processes. Batch experiments were incubated at 20.0 ℃ in domestic sewage-AD supernatant (24∶1) media, and the ratio of ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB) was 7.34%. AD supernatant was injected at the beginning of the anaerobic or aerobic phase and dosed two or three times during the aerobic phase, hereafter referred to as SBR-a, SBR-b, SBR-c, SBR-d, SBR-e and SBR-f. Soluble chemical oxygen demand (SCODCr), PO43--P and NH4+-N concentrations were also determined in the present study. The results showed that adding AD supernatant had no effect on removal of organic matter at various feeding modes. However, removal of PO43--P was low when AD supernatant was treated in AOA-SBR combined with domestic sewage. In fact, phosphate loading rate (PLR) increased by 104.88%. Concentrations of PO43--P in the effluents were also higher than 2.0 mg/L in all experimental conditions, which could have been the limitation of the AOA-SBR system. Specific nitrite production rate (SNPR) in dosing AD supernatant was significantly higher than that of AOA-SBR, but only in the treatment of domestic sewage, which indicated that the addition of AD supernatant helped stabilize shortcut nitrification. Adding AD supernatant at the beginning of the anaerobic phase in AOA-SBR attained the best results, with increases in specific ammonia uptake rate (SAUR) (0.1680 g/(g·d)), SNPR (0.1363 g/(g·d)), and simultaneous nitrification denitrification (SND) rate to 26.64 %. 
Keywords:anaerobic digester supernatant   domestic sewage   biological nitrogen removal   shortcut nitrification   sequencing batch reactor
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号