首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

北京市PM10自动监测网络优化研究
引用本文:齐玲,赵越,谢绍东.北京市PM10自动监测网络优化研究[J].环境科学,2012,33(2):525-531.
作者姓名:齐玲  赵越  谢绍东
作者单位:北京大学环境科学与工程学院,环境模拟与污染控制国家联合重点实验室,北京 100871;北京市环境保护监测中心,北京 100044;北京大学环境科学与工程学院,环境模拟与污染控制国家联合重点实验室,北京 100871
基金项目:环境保护公益性行业科研专项(200709001)
摘    要:以北京市26个PM10监测站点2007-07-01~2008-06-30的监测数据为基础,应用正矩阵因子分析法将这些监测站点划分区域,使得每个区域具有独特的季节变化特征,并依据各类区域的去除偏差识别冗余信息站点,优化监测网络.结果表明,北京市PM10监测网络包括10个具有独特季节变化特征的区域.通州、延庆、密云水库、房山良乡和平谷世纪广场为5个独立区域;丰台花园、丰台云岗、门头沟滨湖广场、海淀北部新区和石景山古城5个西部站点为一个区域;东城东四、东城天坛、西城官园、西城万寿西宫、朝阳奥体中心、朝阳农展馆和顺义站点构成一个区域;南部站点大兴亦庄开发区、大兴黄村和大兴榆垡为一个区域;密云奥林匹克广场和怀柔站点为一个区域;西北部站点海淀香山、昌平定陵、海淀万柳和昌平镇站归为一个区域.每个区域PM10在2007~2008年具有独特的季节变化特征,PM10浓度由北向南逐渐升高.根据去除标准,设置2种PM10监测网络优化方案.方案1以监测网络不确定度为去除标准,12~18个站点即可完全代表26个站点的监测信息;方案2以2倍不确定度为去除标准,各典型月份需要保留的站点数目为10~13个.

关 键 词:PM10  监测网络  优化  正矩阵因子分析  去除偏差
修稿时间:5/3/2011 12:00:00 AM

Optimization of PM10 Monitoring Network in Beijing
QI Ling,ZHAO Yue and XIE Shao-dong.Optimization of PM10 Monitoring Network in Beijing[J].Chinese Journal of Environmental Science,2012,33(2):525-531.
Authors:QI Ling  ZHAO Yue and XIE Shao-dong
Institution:State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;Beijing Municipal Environmental Monitoring Center, Beijing 100044, China;State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Abstract:PM10 monitoring network in Beijing was classified using a new technique, positive matrix factorization (PMF). And then the removal bias of each cluster was calculated by GIS system and sites with redundant information were identified. The daily average mass concentrations of PM10 from July 2007 to June 2008 were analyzed at 26 sites. The result showed that PM10 monitoring network of Beijing was separated into 10 clusters. Tongzhou, Yanqing, Miyunshuiku, Fangshan, and Pinggu formed five separate clusters. The five clusters with more than one site each were Cluster 4, which included sites Fengtaihuayuan, Fengtaiyungang, Mentougou, Haidianbeibuxinqu, and Shijingshan, located within the west developing urban area; Cluster 7, which included Dongchengdongsi, Dongchengtiantan, Xichengwanshouxigong, Xichengguanyuan, Chaoyangaotizhongxin, Chaoyangnongzhanguan, and Shunyi, located mainly within the developed area and the east developing area; Cluster 8, which included Daxingyizhuang, Daxinghuangcun, and Daxingyufa, located within the southern suburban industrial area; Cluster 9, which included Miyunzhen and Huairou, located within the north remote rural area; and Cluster 10, which included Haidianxiangshan, Changpingdingling, Haidianwanliu, and Changpingzhen, located within the northwest suburban area. All the 10 clusters had unique seasonal variations. According to the removal criteria, two scenarios were constructed. The criterion of scenario 1 was the uncertainty of the PM10 monitoring network, and the optimization result in which 12-18 sites should be retained was equal to the original monitoring network included 26 sites. The criterion of scenario 2 was two times of the uncertainty, and 10-13 sites needed to be retained.
Keywords:PM10  monitoring network management  optimization  positive matrix factorization  removal bias
本文献已被 CNKI PubMed 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号