首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

城市浅埋矩形隧道减震层厚度对减震效果的影响分析*
引用本文:崔光耀,魏杭杭,宁茂权,张建军.城市浅埋矩形隧道减震层厚度对减震效果的影响分析*[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2020,16(8):137-142.
作者姓名:崔光耀  魏杭杭  宁茂权  张建军
作者单位:(1.北方工业大学 土木工程学院,北京 100144; 2.中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司,湖北 武汉 430063;3.中国市政工程华北设计研究总院有限公司,天津 300051)
基金项目:* 基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(51408008);北京市青年拔尖人才培育计划项目(CIT&TCD201704013);北京市属高校基本科研业务费项目(110052971921/061);中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司重大科研项目(2020K107)
摘    要:为研究减震层厚度对减震效果的影响,以某城市浅埋双连拱矩形隧道工程为例,利用数值模拟软件ABAQUS对比分析50,100,150 mm 3种厚度减震层的减震效果。结果表明:施设50 mm厚减震层时,边墙收敛减小14.90%,最大、最小主应力最大值分别减小13.96%和9.59%,最大剪应力减小3.22%,最小安全系数最小提高23.13%;施设100 mm厚减震层时,边墙收敛减小6.63%,最大、最小主应力分别减小14.70%和11.90%,最大剪应力减小4.56%,最小安全系数最小提高41.39%;施设150 mm厚减震层时,边墙收敛减小4.65%,最大、最小主应力最大值减小幅度较大,其中最小主应力最大值减小了14.03%,最大剪应力减小6.17%,最小安全系数最小提高42.72%;施设100 mm厚减震层优于50 mm和150 mm厚减震层。研究成果可为城市浅埋双连拱矩形隧道的减震设计提供参考。

关 键 词:城市矩形隧道  浅埋  双连拱  减震层  减震效果

Analysis on influence of thickness of shock absorption layer on shock absorption effect of urban shallow buried rectangular tunnel
CUI Guangyao,WEI Hanghang,NING Maoquan,ZHANG Jianjun.Analysis on influence of thickness of shock absorption layer on shock absorption effect of urban shallow buried rectangular tunnel[J].Journal of Safety Science and Technology,2020,16(8):137-142.
Authors:CUI Guangyao  WEI Hanghang  NING Maoquan  ZHANG Jianjun
Institution:(1.School of Civil Engineering,North China University of Technology,Beijing 100144,China;2.China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co.,Ltd.,Wuhan Hubei 430063,China;3.China Municipal Engineering North China Design & Research Institute Co.,Ltd.,Tianjin 300051,China)
Abstract:In order to study the influence of the thickness of the shock absorbing layer on the shock absorbing effect,taking a shallow buried double arch rectangular tunnel project in a city as an example,the numerical simulation software ABAQUS was used to compare and analyze the shock absorbing effect of three kinds of shock absorbing layers with the thickness of 50,100 and 150 mm.The results showed that when applying the shock absorption layer with the thickness of 50 mm,the side wall convergence decreased by 14.90%,the maximum of maximum and minimum principal stress decreased by 13.96% and 9.59%,respectively,the maximum shear stress decreased by 3.22%,and the minimum safety factor increased by 23.13% at least;When applying the shock absorption layer with the thickness of 100 mm,the side wall convergence decreased by 6.63%,the maximum of maximum and minimum principal stress decreased by 14.70% and 11.90%,respectively,the maximum shear stress decreased by 4.56%,and the minimum safety factor increased by 41.39% at least.When applying the shock absorption layer with the thickness of 150mm,the side wall convergence decreases by 4.65%, and the maximum of maximum and minimum principal stresses decrease by a large margin, among which the maximum minimum principal stresses decrease by 14.03%,the maximum shear stress decreased by 6.17%,and the minimum safety factor increased by 42.72% at least.The shock absorption layer with the thickness of 100 mm was better than those with the thickness of 50 mm and 150 mm.The research results can provide reference for the shock absorption design of urban shallow buried double arch rectangular tunnels.
Keywords:urban rectangular tunnel  shallow burial  double arch  shock absorption layer  shock absorption effect
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国安全生产科学技术》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国安全生产科学技术》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号