Incorporating Variable Source Area Hydrology into a Spatially Distributed Direct Runoff Model1 |
| |
Authors: | Brian Buchanan Zachary M. Easton Rebecca Schneider M. Todd Walter |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Respectively, Graduate Student, Associate Professor (Buchanan, Schneider), Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853;2. Assistant Professor (Easton), Department of Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061;3. Associate Professor (Walter), Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 |
| |
Abstract: | Buchanan, Brian, Zachary M. Easton, Rebecca Schneider, and M. Todd Walter, 2011. Incorporating Variable Source Area Hydrology Into a Spatially Distributed Direct Runoff Model. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA) 48(1): 43‐60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752‐1688.2011.00594.x Abstract: Few hydrologic models simulate both variable source area (VSA) hydrology, and runoff‐routing at high enough spatial resolutions to capture fine‐scale hydrologic pathways connecting VSA to the stream network. This paper describes a geographic information system‐based operational model that simulates the spatio‐temporal dynamics of VSA runoff generation and distributed runoff‐routing, including through complex artificial drainage networks. The model combines the Natural Resource Conservation Service’s Curve Number (CN) equation for estimating storm runoff with the topographic index concept for predicting the locations of VSA and a runoff‐routing algorithm into a new spatially distributed direct hydrograph (SDDH) model (SDDH‐VSA). Using a small agricultural watershed in central New York, SDDH‐VSA results were compared to those from a SDDH model using the traditional land use assumptions for the CN (SDDH‐CN). The SDDH‐VSA model generally agreed better with observed discharge than the SDDH‐CN model (average, Nash‐Sutcliffe efficiency of 0.69 vs. 0.58, respectively) and resulted in more realistic spatial patterns of runoff‐generating areas. The SDDH approach did not correctly capture the timing of runoff from small storms in dry periods. Despite this type of limitation, SDDH‐VSA extends the applicability of the SDDH technique to VSA conditions, providing a basis for new tools to help identify critical management areas and assess water quality risks due to landscape alterations. |
| |
Keywords: | runoff simulation watershed management open channel flow streamflow surface water hydrology surface/groundwater interactions |
|
|