首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

偏心结构空间杆系模型与空间实体模型的对比分析研究
引用本文:杜宏彪,管民生,侯世峰,周军.偏心结构空间杆系模型与空间实体模型的对比分析研究[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2009,29(5):496-501.
作者姓名:杜宏彪  管民生  侯世峰  周军
作者单位:1. 广东工业大学建设学院,广州,510006
2. 广东工业大学建设学院,广州,510006;华南理工大学土木与交通学院,广州,510640
基金项目:广东工业大学青年基金项目 
摘    要:分别用空间杆系模型和空间实体模型对偏心结构进行弹塑性时程分析,并比较两者的差别。研究发现,在结构刚进入塑性阶段时,采用空间杆系模型和空间实体模型得出的偏心结构塑性变形接近;而结构产生较大塑性变形时,采用空间实体模型得出的偏心结构塑性变形要比采用空间杆系模型得出的大许多。

关 键 词:偏心结构  地震反应  空间杆系模型  空间实体模型

Comparison of Beam-Column Element and Solid Element for Eccentric Structures
DU Hong-biao,GUAN Min-sheng,HOU Shi-feng,ZHOU Jun.Comparison of Beam-Column Element and Solid Element for Eccentric Structures[J].Journal of Disaster Prevent and Mitigation Eng,2009,29(5):496-501.
Authors:DU Hong-biao  GUAN Min-sheng  HOU Shi-feng  ZHOU Jun
Institution:DU Hong-biao1,GUAN Min-sheng1,2,HOU Shi-feng1,ZHOU Jun1 (1.Faculty of Construction,Guangdong University of Technology,Guangzhou 510006,China,2.School of Civil and Transportation Engineering,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510640,China)
Abstract:A few eccentric structures are modeled with beam-column element and solid element respectively for comparison in this paper.Several nonlinear dynamic time-history analyses of the structures have been carried out with the two types of finite elements.The differences between the two finite elements are compared.It is found that the plastic deformations of the structures are close to each other at the beginning of plastic phase of the structures,but the plastic deformation obtained with the solid element is fa...
Keywords:eccentric structure  seismic response  model of beam-column element  model of solid element  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号