首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Transitions of municipal solid waste management. Part II: Hybrid life cycle assessment of Swiss glass-packaging disposal
Institution:1. Institute for Environmental Decisions, Natural and Social Science Interface, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland;2. BWS Bauphysik AG, 8408 Winterthur, Switzerland;3. Division of Resource Efficiency and Waste Management, Ernst Basler + Partner, 8702 Zollikofen, Switzerland;1. Engineering Department, Dalhousie University, Faculty of Agriculture, P.O. Box 550, Truro, NS, Canada B2N5E3;2. Rural Research Centre, Dalhousie University, Faculty of Agriculture, P.O. Box 550, Truro, NS, Canada B2N5E3;1. Civil & Infrastructure Engineering Discipline, School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia;2. Yarra City Council, City of Yarra, Victoria, Australia;1. Packaging Materials Department, National Research Centre, Elbuhouth Street 33, 12622 Dokki, Cairo, Egypt;2. Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Helwan University, 11795 Cairo, Egypt
Abstract:In policy support of municipal solid waste (MSW) management, life cycle assessment (LCA) can serve to compare the environmental or economic impacts of two or more options for waste processing. The scope of waste management LCAs generally focuses less attention on future developments, e.g., where will recycling take place, and more on the environmental performance of prototypes, e.g., the incineration of all waste compared to recycling. To provide more robust support for Swiss waste glass-packaging disposal, scenarios of Swiss waste glass-packaging are assessed from a life cycle perspective. The scenarios consist in schemes for the disposal of the total amount of Swiss waste glass-packaging, i.e., different combinations of recycling and downcycling in Switzerland or abroad developed in Part I, Meylan et al. (2013). In this article (Part II), the disposal schemes are assessed with respect to eco-efficiency, an indicator that combines total environmental impacts and gross value added in Switzerland. Results show that no policy alternative guarantees environmental impact reductions and gross value added gains under all developments of exogenous constraints. Downcycling to foam glass in Switzerland is not only an environmentally sound disposal option, but it also buffers gross value added losses in case domestic recycling (and thus glass-packaging production in Switzerland) ceases in the future. The substitution of products based on raw materials other than Swiss cullet is the main responsible for change in environmental and economic impacts. Hence, an eco-efficiency maximizing policy should consider the products of disposal schemes. The combination of scenario analysis and eco-efficiency assessment as presented in this paper can be applied to other contexts (i.e., countries, waste fractions).
Keywords:Hybrid life cycle assessment (HLCA)  Eco-efficiency  Glass-packaging  Policy support  Scenario assessment
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号