首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Evaluation of life cycle inventory data for recycling systems
Institution:1. Department of Environmental Engineering, Building 115, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark;2. Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Box 7908, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7908 United States;1. São Paulo Agency of Agribusiness Technology – Government of the State of São Paulo, Postal Box 61, 15500-970 Votuporanga, São Paulo, Brazil;2. Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Embrapa Mid-North, BR 343, km 35, Zona Rural, Parnaíba-PI, 64.200-970 Parnaíba, Piauí, Brazil;3. Sao Paulo State University, Praça Infante Dom Henrique, s/n, Parque Bitaru, 11330-900 São Vicente, São Paulo, Brazil;4. São Paulo Agency of Agribusiness Technology – Government of the State of São Paulo, Postal Box 60, 13460-000 Nova Odessa, São Paulo, Brazil;1. Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences, University of Florida, United States;2. Department of Sciences and Technologies, Parthenope University of Napoli & School of Environments Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China;1. Centre of Competence Paper and Board, Ijsselburcht 3, 6825 BS, The Netherlands;2. Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands;1. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, Tianjin 300457, China;2. State Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, China;3. Energy Analysis and Environmental Impacts Department, Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA;1. CESAM, Department of Environment and Planning, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal;2. Department of Chemical Engineering, Institute of Technology, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain;3. Irstea, UMR ITAP, ELSA Group, 351 rue J F Breton, 34 196 Montpellier Cedex 5, France;4. CIRAD, BioWooEB Research Unit (Biomass, Wood, Energy, Bioproducts), TA B-114/16, 73 rue Jean-François Breton, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France;5. SosteniPrA (UAB-IRTA-Inèdit), Institute of Environmental Science and Technology (ICTA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), School of Engineering, Campus de la UAB, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), 08193 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Abstract:This paper reviews databases on material recycling (primary as well as secondary production) used in life cycle assessments (LCA) of waste management systems. A total of 366 datasets, from 1980 to 2010 and covering 14 materials, were collected from databases and reports. Totals for CO2-equivalent emissions were compared to illustrate variations in the data. It was hypothesised that emissions from material production and the recycling industry had decreased over time due to increasing regulation, energy costs and process optimisation, but the reported datasets did not reveal such a general trend. Data representing the same processes varied considerably between databases, and proper background information was hard to obtain, which in turn made it difficult to explain the large differences observed. Those differences between the highest and lowest estimated CO2 emissions (equivalents) from the primary production of newsprint, HDPE and glass were 238%, 443% and 452%, respectively. For steel and aluminium the differences were 1761% and 235%, respectively. There is a severe lack of data for some recycled materials; for example, only one dataset existed for secondary cardboard. The study shows that the choice of dataset used to represent the environmental load of a material recycling process and credited emissions from the avoided production of virgin materials is crucial for the outcome of an LCA on waste management. Great care and a high degree of transparency are mandatory, but advice on which datasets to use could not be determined from the study. However, from the gathered data, recycling in general showed lower emission of CO2 per kg material than primary production, so the recycling of materials (considered in this study) is thus beneficial in most cases.
Keywords:Life cycle inventory databases  Waste recycling  Plastics  Paper  Cardboard  Glass  Aluminium  Steel  Life cycle assessment
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号