首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

深圳大鹏半岛沙滩质量评价研究
引用本文:龙鑫玲,陈丕茂,段晓伟,陈佳荣,魏晓,石晶. 深圳大鹏半岛沙滩质量评价研究[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2020, 39(4): 576-584. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes.20190016
作者姓名:龙鑫玲  陈丕茂  段晓伟  陈佳荣  魏晓  石晶
作者单位:1.农业农村部南海渔业资源环境科学观测实验站,中国水产科学研究院南海水产研究所,广东 广州 510300
基金项目:深圳市大鹏新区经济服务局项目;中国水产科学研究院基本科研业务费专项;国家科技支撑计划
摘    要:沙滩是开发滨海旅游业和休闲渔业的重要依托,沙滩质量评价是保护和合理开发利用沙滩的重要依据。根据深圳大鹏半岛沙滩资源环境特点,参考国内外沙滩质量评价研究,构建一套适用于大鹏半岛沙滩质量评价体系,该体系涵盖自然、社会和人文三类要素,包括反映沙滩特征和功能的一级指标2项5大类9个亚类共33个因子,运用层次分析法确定指标权重。将沙滩质量得分划分为优(≥80)、良(70~80)、及格(60~70)、中(50~60)、差(<50)等5个等级。对大鹏半岛53个沙滩质量的评价结果表明,沙滩资源环境质量、沙滩旅游服务质量平均得分分别为68.62、46.88,沙滩资源环境质量评价等级为及格,沙滩旅游服务质量评价等级为差;沙滩综合质量评价为优的沙滩3个、良的沙滩11个、及格的沙滩15个、中的沙滩20个、差的沙滩4个,平均得分63.04,沙滩综合质量评价等级为及格。根据沙滩质量评价情况提出沙滩开发管理建议。

关 键 词:沙滩质量   评价体系   层次分析法   深圳大鹏半岛
收稿时间:2019-01-16

Study on beaches quality evaluation in Dapeng peninsula,Shenzhen
Xin-ling LONG,Pi-mao CHEN,Xiao-wei DUAN,Jia-rong CHEN,Xiao WEI,Jing SHI. Study on beaches quality evaluation in Dapeng peninsula,Shenzhen[J]. Marine Environmental Science, 2020, 39(4): 576-584. DOI: 10.12111/j.mes.20190016
Authors:Xin-ling LONG  Pi-mao CHEN  Xiao-wei DUAN  Jia-rong CHEN  Xiao WEI  Jing SHI
Affiliation:1.Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Science, Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of South China Sea Fishery Resources and Environment, Guangzhou 510300, China
Abstract:Beaches are an important support for the development of coastal tourism and recreational fisheries. Beach quality evaluation is an important basis for the protection and rational development and utilization of beaches. Based on the characteristics of the resources environment of Dapeng peninsula beaches in Shenzhen, a suitable quality evaluation system was constructed for Dapeng peninsula referred to main domestic and overseas quality evaluation systems of beaches. The quality evaluation system covers three elements: nature, society and humanity. To be specific, this system consists of 2 aspects, 5 categories, 9 sub-categories and 33 factors that reflected the characteristics and functions of the beaches. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was applied to determining the indicators weight. There are five grades given by the beach quality evaluation system which were excellent beaches (≥80), good beaches (70~80), passing beaches (60~70), medium beaches (50~60) and poor beaches (<50). The results showed that the average score of beaches quality was 68.62 in resources and environment. The quality of most beaches resources and environment was pass level. The average score of beaches tourism service quality was 46.88. The quality of beaches tourism service was poor. The quality was evaluated as 3 excellent beaches, 11 good beaches, 15 passing beaches, 20 medium beaches and 4 poor beaches. The comprehensive quality evaluation level of the beach was passing. According to the evaluation of beaches quality, beaches development and management suggestion was proposed.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《海洋环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《海洋环境科学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号