首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Analysis of building environment assessment frameworks and their implications for sustainability indicators
Authors:Yuya Kajikawa  Toshihiro Inoue  Thong Ngee Goh
Institution:(1) Institute of Engineering Innovation, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 2-11-16 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan;(2) Department of Technology Management for Innovation, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan;(3) Integrated Research System for Sustainability Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan;(4) Center for Low Carbon Society Strategy, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Tokyo, Japan;(5) Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan;(6) Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Abstract:Green construction is gaining increasing attention in the global context. However, the construction of sustainable green buildings and environments involves different tools and systems and diverse perspectives. Therefore, the development of environmental assessment tools is an important task for managing green housing and green building projects. In this paper, we discuss the benefits, limitations, and future directions of the assessment framework. There are four characteristics of building environmental assessment, i.e., comprehensiveness, design guideline, signaling, and communication tools, which afford both benefits and limitations. We illustrate the role of the assessment framework as a hub promoting integration of diverse knowledge, as a design guideline encouraging better design and action, as signaling environmentally friendly design and action, and as a communication tool. On the other hand, there are limitations, such as the use of a mixture of quantitative and qualitative measures, ambiguity of weighing, lack of financial evaluation, and lack of involvement of diverse disciplines and stakeholders. To develop an effective assessment framework, the following three factors must be considered: knowledge, power, and implementation. We propose that knowledge innovation, a credible approach for a salient solution, and collective action represent the future challenges of the assessment framework.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号