首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Assessing field vulnerability to phosphorus loss in Beijing agricultural areausing Revised Field Phosphorus Ranking Scheme
Authors:LI Qi  CHEN Li-ding  QI Xin  ZHANG Xin-yu  MA Yan  FU Bo-jie
Affiliation:1. State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China;Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China
Abstract:
Guanting Reservoir, one of the drinking water supply sources of Beijing, suffers from water eutrophication. It is mainly supplied by Guishui River. Thus, to investigate the reasons of phosphorus (P) loss and improve the P management strategies in Guishui River watershed are important for the safety of drinking water in this region. In this study, a revised Field P Ranking Scheme (PRS) was developed to reflect the field vulnerability of P loss at the field scale based on the PRS. In this new scheme, six factors are included, and each one was assigned a relative weight and a determination method. The affecting factors were classified into transport factors and source factors, and, the standards of environmental quality on surface water and soil erosion classification and degradation of the China were used in this scheme. By the new scheme, thirty-four fields in the Guishui River were categorized as "low", "medium" or "high" potential for P loss into the runoff. The results showed that the P loss risks of orchard and vegetable fields were higher than that of corn and soybean fields. The source factors were the main factors to affect P loss from the study area. In the study area, controlling P input and improving P usage efficiency are critical to decrease P loss. Based on the results, it was suggested that more attention should be paid on the fields of vegetable and orchard since they have extremely high usage rate of P and high soil test of P. Compared with P surplus by field measurements, the Revised Field PRS was more suitable for reflecting the characteristics of fields, and had higher potential capacity to identify critical source areas of P loss than PRS.
Keywords:phosphorus loss  risk assessment  field scale  revised phosphorus ranking scheme  management strategy  Scheme  Ranking  Phosphorus  Field  Revised  area  agricultural  Beijing  loss  vulnerability  capacity  identify  characteristics  surplus  measurements  attention  paid  rate  soil test  controlling
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学学报(英文版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学学报(英文版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号