首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

免耕对农田土壤团聚体的影响研究:Meta分析
引用本文:徐艺萍,饶越悦,孟艳,温媛,孟维伟,王旭清,李宗新,刘开昌,代红翠. 免耕对农田土壤团聚体的影响研究:Meta分析[J]. 环境科学, 2024, 45(2): 952-960
作者姓名:徐艺萍  饶越悦  孟艳  温媛  孟维伟  王旭清  李宗新  刘开昌  代红翠
作者单位:山东省农业科学院小麦玉米国家工程研究中心, 济南 250100;中国农业大学农学院, 北京 100193
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(32001487);山东省青年科技人才托举工程项目(SDAST2021qt04);山东省农业科学院农业科技创新工程项目(CXGC2022E01,CXGC2021B08,CXGC2021C03)
摘    要:为明确免耕对农田土壤团聚体的影响,通过Meta分析整合已发表的116项研究,综合探究免耕对土壤团聚体粒径分布、平均重量直径(MWD)以及团聚体有机碳含量的影响.结果表明,与耕作相比,免耕显著提高土壤大团聚体占比(10.9%)和MWD(12.8%),减少黏粉粒占比(-15.5%),但对微团聚体及团聚体有机碳含量没有显著影响.亚组分析表明,免耕显著提高西北地区土壤大团聚体占比(17.6%),提高华北地区土壤团聚体MWD(15.4%);在旱地及黏壤土中,免耕分别提高团聚体MWD效应值12.6%和18.4%;免耕提高大团聚体占比的效果随土壤pH值增加而增加;秸秆还田条件下,免耕显著提高土壤大团聚体占比(9.6%)及MWD(11.6%),秸秆移除后,免耕对团聚体的影响效应均不显著;在试验年限方面,短期免耕(< 5 a)显著提高土壤大团聚体比例,而长期免耕(> 10 a)提高团聚体MWD;在土壤深度方面,免耕仅能改善耕层(0~20 cm)土壤团聚体粒径分布及MWD,而对深层土壤(> 20 cm)团聚体没有影响.综上所述,免耕能够改善土壤团聚体粒径分布及稳定性,但对团聚体碳含量无显著影响.在实际生产中,要充分考虑生产区域、土壤性质和田间管理等因素,以达到有效改良土壤团聚体的目的.

关 键 词:免耕  土壤团聚体  平均重量直径(MWD)  团聚体有机碳  Meta分析
收稿时间:2023-03-16
修稿时间:2023-05-04

Effect of No-tillage on Soil Aggregates in Farmland:A Meta Analysis
XU Yi-ping,RAO Yue-yue,MENG Yan,WEN Yuan,MENG Wei-wei,WANG Xu-qing,LI Zong-xin,LIU Kai-chang,DAI Hong-cui. Effect of No-tillage on Soil Aggregates in Farmland:A Meta Analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Science, 2024, 45(2): 952-960
Authors:XU Yi-ping  RAO Yue-yue  MENG Yan  WEN Yuan  MENG Wei-wei  WANG Xu-qing  LI Zong-xin  LIU Kai-chang  DAI Hong-cui
Affiliation:National Engineering Research Center of Wheat and Maize, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Science, Jinan 250100, China;College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
Abstract:In order to clarify the impact of no-tillage on the quality of farmland soil aggregates in China and promote the adaptive application of no-tillage practices, a Meta-analysis was conducted by collecting data from 116 published studies. The effects of no-tillage on aggregate size distribution, mean weight diameter (MWD), and aggregate-associated C were studied. The results showed that compared with that under tillage, no-tillage significantly increased the proportion of macroaggregates (10.9%) and MWD (12.8%) and decreased the proportion of clay and silt (-15.5%) but had no significant effect on soil microaggregate and aggregate-associated C. The subgroup and Meta regression analysis showed that no-tillage significantly increased the proportion of macroaggregates in Northwest China (17.6%) and MWD in North China (15.4%). In upland and clay loam, no-tillage increased MWD by 12.6% and 18.4%, respectively. The effect of no-tillage on increasing the proportion of macroaggregates increased with the soil pH. When straw returned, no-tillage significantly increased the proportion of macroaggregates (9.6%) and MWD (11.6%), but no significant effect of no-tillage on aggregates was found after straw removal. Regarding test duration, short-term ( < 5 a) no-tillage could significantly increase the proportion of macroaggregates, whereas long-term ( > 10 a) no-tillage could improve the MWD. In different soil layers, no-tillage could only significantly improve the aggregate size distribution and MWD in topsoil (0-20 cm) but had no effect in subsoil ( > 20 cm). In summary, no-tillage could improve aggregate size distribution and stability but had no effect on aggregate-associated C. Production region, soil properties, field management methods, and other factors should be fully considered in production practice to effectively improve the quality of soil aggregates.
Keywords:no-tillage  soil aggregates  mean weight diameter (MWD)  aggregate-associated SOC  Meta analysis
点击此处可从《环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号