首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Role of and challenges to environmental impact assessment proponents in Pakistan
Affiliation:1. Netherlands Commission for Environmental Assessment, PO Box 2345; 3500 GH, Utrecht, The Netherlands;2. Environmental Governance, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands;3. Environmental Governance, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands;4. Forest and Nature Conservation Policy Group, Wageningen University and Research Centre, Wageningen, The Netherlands;1. Department of Asian and North African Studies, University Ca'' Foscari Venice, Italy;2. Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, University Ca'' Foscari Venice, Italy;1. Arup, 1 West Regent Street, Glasgow G2 1RW, UK;2. Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XJ, UK;1. IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute Ltd, P.O. Box 5302, SE-400 14 Gothenburg, Sweden;2. IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute Ltd, P.O. Box 210 60, SE-100 31 Stockholm, Sweden
Abstract:This study identified the role of and challenges faced by Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) proponents in Punjab, Pakistan. Expected roles of proponents in EIA were taken from regulations, legislation and guidelines. The comments of consultants, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) regarding the role played by proponents were extracted from literature and used for evaluation. To identify the challenges of proponents in each step of the EIA, 40 semi-structured interviews were conducted with private and government proponents in Punjab. Oftentimes, projects start prior to obtaining an environmental approval. Proper scoping is seldom conducted. Stakeholder involvement in EIA is limited. Proponents sometimes do not share complete project information with consultants, which compromises the report quality and timely decision making. Moreover, some proponents attempt to influence the review and decision making and do not ensure compliance to approval conditions except for few multinationals. The key challenge highlighted by proponents was the discrimination on part of the EPA between private and government projects. Other challenges included lack of professionalism of some consultants and delayed and non-transparent decision making. Although regional in scope, the results of the study hold importance for EIA systems worldwide particularly in countries with similar economic systems who are facing a trade-off between economic growth and environmental sustainability.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号