Effectiveness of Radon Control Techniques in Fifteen Homes

Radon control systems were Installed and evaluated In fourteen homes In the Spokane River Valley/Rathdrum Prairie and In one home In Vancouver, Washington. Because of local soil conditions, subsurface ventilation (SSV) by pressurlzatlon was always more effective In these houses than SSV by depressurlzatlon In reducing Indoor radon levels to below guidelines. Basement overpressurlzatlon was successfully applied In five houses with airtight basements where practical-sized fans could develop an overpressure of 1 to 3 Pascals. Crawlspace ventilation was more effective than crawlspace Isolation in reducing radon entry from the crawlspace, but had to be used In conjunction with other mitigation techniques, since the houses also had basements. Indoor radon concentrations In two houses with alr-toalr heat exchangers (AAHX) were reduced to levels Inversely dependent on the new total ventilation rates and were lowered even further In one house where the air distribution system was modified. Sealing penetrations In the below-grade surfaces of substructures was relatively Ineffective In controlling radon. Operation of the radon control systems (except for the AAHX’s) made no measureable change in ventilation rates or Indoor concentrations of other measured pollutants. Installation costs by treated floor area ranged from approximately $4/m² for sealing to $28/m² for the AAHX’s. Based on the low electric rates for the region, annual operating costs for the active systems were estimated to be approximately $60 to $170.