Environmental tobacco smoke particles in multizone indoor environments |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Mary Kay O''Connor Process Safety Center, Artie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering Department, Texas A&M University System, College Station, TX 77843-3122, USA;2. Mary Kay O''Connor Process Safety Center – Qatar, Texas A&M University at Qatar, PO Box 23874, Education City, Doha, Qatar;1. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy;2. Université de Toulouse, UPS, INSA, UT1, UTM, CNRS, UMR 5219, Institut de Mathématiques de Toulouse, F-31062 Toulouse, France;1. Department of Phamacology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States;2. Division of Renal-Electrolyte, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA., United States;1. Helmholtz Zentrum München – German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Radiation Protection, Ingolstädter Landstraβe 1, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany;2. Department of Physics, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria;3. Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Department of Technology and Health, Viale Regina Elena 299, I-00161 Roma, Italy |
| |
Abstract: | Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) is a major source of human exposure to airborne particles. To better understand the factors that affect exposure, and to investigate the potential effectiveness of technical control measures, a series of experiments was conducted in a two-room test facility. Particle concentrations, size distributions, and airflow rates were measured during and after combustion of a cigarette. Experiments were varied to obtain information about the effects on exposure of smoker segregation, ventilation modification, and air filtration. The experimental data were used to test the performance of an analytical model of the two-zone environment and a numerical multizone aerosol dynamics model. A respiratory tract particle deposition model was also applied to the results to estimate the mass of ETS particles that would be deposited in the lungs of a nonsmoker exposed in either the smoking or nonsmoking room. Comparisons between the experimental data and model predictions showed good agreement. For time-averaged particle mass concentration, the average bias between model and experiments was less than 10%. The average absolute error was typically 35%, probably because of variability in particle emission rates from cigarettes. For the conditions tested, the use of a portable air filtration unit yielded 65–90% reductions in predicted lung deposition relative to the baseline scenario. The use of exhaust ventilation in the smoking room reduced predicted lung deposition in the nonsmoking room by more than 80%, as did segregating the smoker from nonsmokers with a closed door. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|