Why not in your backyard? scientific data and nonrational decisions about risk |
| |
Authors: | Daniel E Willard Melinda M Swenson |
| |
Institution: | (1) School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, 47401 Bloomington, Indiana;(2) School of Nursing, Indiana University, 46204 Indianapolis, Indiana |
| |
Abstract: | The siting of hazardous waste facilities constitutes a special case of the many no win environmental decisions we face. They share common features: (a) we must decide something; (b) the decision affects some people more than others; (c) as scientists we are not 100% confident of our research results; (d) elements of the decision remain unquantifiable; and (e) decisions combine both scientific and political elements. In this paper we attempt to illustrate and analyze several examples that combine all of these elements and to suggest methods which would lead toward a scientific valid and politically useful resolution. Using well-known examples such as the public's fear of death from nuclear power, snakebite, and smoking, we attempt to integrate public perception of risks into a decision-making model. Finally, the conclusions deal with the role of policy making, public perception, and science in resolving environmental controversies. We do not, however, solve this perplexing problem. |
| |
Keywords: | Nonrational risk assessment Policy making Decision matrix |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|