| Abstract: | As part of the ongoing work to develop new guidelines for oil spill identification for the European Committee for Standardization (CEN), a Round Robin test was arranged by SINTEF in co-operation with the Norwegian General Standardizing Body (NAS). Twelve laboratories from ten countries participated in the Round Robin study. They include: Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Scotland, Sweden, Wales, and the U.S.A. The analytical methodology used for the Round Robin testing is a result of the ongoing project "Revision of the Nordtest Methodology for Oil Spill Identification". The analytical methodology is described in the AMOP proceedings 2002. Seven oil samples (two artificially weathered "spill" samples and five possible sources) were analyzed following the recommended analytical protocols. The Round Robin study was a "difficult case", because the two spill samples and three of the suspected sources were highly correlated to one another. These samples were from the same oil field in the North Sea, but from different production wells. The present paper summarizes the Round Robin study, and demonstrates the potential of this methodology as a strong technically defensible tool in oil spill identification due to its ability to distinguish qualitatively similar oils from a spill and any available candidate source. |
