首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于PMF模型解析九龙江河口表层沉积物重金属来源
引用本文:林承奇,陈枫桦,胡恭任,于瑞莲,黄华斌.基于PMF模型解析九龙江河口表层沉积物重金属来源[J].地球与环境,2020,48(4):443-451.
作者姓名:林承奇  陈枫桦  胡恭任  于瑞莲  黄华斌
作者单位:1. 厦门华厦学院 环境与公共健康学院, 福建 厦门 361024;2. 华侨大学 化工学院, 福建 厦门 361021;3. 环境监测福建省高校重点实验室, 福建 厦门 361024
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(21777049);环境监测福建省高校重点实验室开放研究课题资助项目(HJJC1802);福建省中青年教师教育科研项目(JT180785);福建省大学生创新训练项目(201912709012)。
摘    要:为研究九龙江河口表层沉积物中重金属来源,分析测定了表层沉积物中15种重金属含量,并用正定矩阵因子分析模型(PMF)解析表层沉积物中重金属来源。结果表明,九龙江河口表层沉积物中大部分重金属相对福建省土壤环境背景值已存在一定程度的富集。各重金属在研究区域分布差异较大,其中Co、Rb和Th属于低分异; Be、V、Ni、Zn、Sr、Mo、Cd、Pb、Hg和U属于中等分异; Cr和Cu属于高分异。沉积物中重金属实测值与PMF模型预测值拟合曲线呈现较好相关性,PMF模型结果与铅同位素示踪结果相近,能满足研究需要。九龙江河口表层沉积物中重金属主要来源有自然源、化石燃料燃烧、农业活动和采矿活动,其对表层沉积物中重金属的综合贡献率分别为35. 6%、32. 5%、11. 2%和20. 7%。

关 键 词:正定矩阵因子分析模型(PMF)  源解析  沉积物  重金属  九龙江河口
收稿时间:2019/9/5 0:00:00
修稿时间:2019/12/24 0:00:00

Source Apportionment of Heavy Metals in Surface Sediments of the Jiulong River Estuary Based on Positive Matrix Factorization
LIN Chengqi,CHEN Fenghu,HU Gongren,YU Ruilian,HUANG Huabin.Source Apportionment of Heavy Metals in Surface Sediments of the Jiulong River Estuary Based on Positive Matrix Factorization[J].Earth and Environment,2020,48(4):443-451.
Authors:LIN Chengqi  CHEN Fenghu  HU Gongren  YU Ruilian  HUANG Huabin
Institution:1. College of Environment and Public Health, Xiamen Huaxia University, Xiamen Fujian 361024, China;2. College of Chemical Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen Fujian 361021, China;3. Key Laboratory of Fujian Universities for Environmental Monitoring, Xiamen Fujian 361024, China
Abstract:In order to apportion sources of heavy metals in surface sediments of the Jiulong River Estuary, contents of fifteen heavy metals in surface sediments were determined and the Positive matrix factorization model (PMF) was used. The results showed that, compared with their background values in soils of the Fujian province, most heavy metals were enriched in the surface sediments and had different variation levels in the spatial distribution in the study area. Co, Rb and Th showed low variations; Be, V, Ni, Zn, Sr, Mo, Cd, Pb, Hg and U showed moderate variations; Cr and Cu showed high variations. This study showed that results of the PMF model were reasonable and met the research needs, since predicted values of the PMF model were consistent with measured values and results of the PMF model were consistent with those of the Pb isotope trace model. The results of PMF indicated that there were four major potential heavy metal sources, natural source, fossil fuel combustion, agricultural activities and mining activities, whose contribution rates were 35.6%, 32.5%, 11.2% and 20.7%, respectively. The natural source contributed most to Mo, U, V, Zn, Th and Rb with the contribution rates of 60.6%, 52.4%, 49.1%, 47.3%, 45.9% and 38.7%, respectively, the fossil fuel combustion contributed most to Be, V, Cr, Sr and Hg with the contribution rates of 40.7%, 46.6%, 62.0%, 50.8% and 43.3%, respectively, the agricultural activities contributed most to Cd with the contribution rate of 41.6%, and the mining activities contributed most to Ni, Cu and Zn with the contribution rates of 45.2%, 44.3% and 46.0%, respectively.
Keywords:positive matrix factorization (PMF)  source apportionment  sediment  heavy metal  Jiulong River Estuary
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地球与环境》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地球与环境》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号