首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Use of questionnaires and an expert panel to judge the environmental consequences of chemical spills for the development of an environment-accident index
Authors:Andersson Asa Scott  Stjernström Olof  Fängmark Ingrid
Institution:1. Swedish Defence Research Agency, Division of NBC Defence, SE-901 82 Umeå, Sweden;2. Environmental Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden;3. Department of Social and Economic Geography, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden;1. Centre for Nanotechnology & Advanced Biomaterials (CeNTAB), SASTRA University, Thanjavur 613401, Tamil Nadu, India;2. School of Electrical & Electronics Engineering, SASTRA University, Thanjavur 613401, Tamil Nadu, India;1. Ted Rogers School of Hospitality and Tourism Management, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5B 2K3;2. Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5B 2K3;1. Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou 450008, China;2. School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
Abstract:Assessing the environmental consequences of a chemical accident is a complex task. To date, the methods used to evaluate the environmental effects of an acute release of a chemical have often been based on measurements of chemical and physical variables deemed to be important, such as the concentration of the chemical. However, a broader strategy is needed to predict the environmental consequences of potential accidents during the planning process. An Environment-Accident Index (EAI), a simple tool based on such a strategy, has been developed to facilitate the consideration of a multitude of influential variables. The objectives of this study were to evaluate whether questionnaire-based expert panel's judgements could provide useful data on the environmental consequences of chemical spills, and an effective basis for further development of the EAI. As expected, the judgements did not agree perfectly, but they do give rough indications of the environmental effects, and highlight consistent trends that should be useful inputs for planning, prevention and decontamination processes. The different accidents were also judged to have caused everything from minor to very major effects in the environment, implying that a wide range of accident scenarios were represented in the material and covered by the EAI. Therefore, questionnaires and expert panel judgements can be used to collect useful data for estimating the likely environmental consequences of chemical accidents and for further development of the EAI.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号