Social sensitivity analysis in conflictive environmental governance: A case of forest planning |
| |
| Institution: | 1. Department of Applied Economics and Qualitative Methods, University of La Laguna, Canary Islands 38200, Spain;2. Department of Techniques and Projects in Engineering and Architecture, University of La Laguna, Canary Islands 38200, Spain;1. BioSP, INRA, Avignon 84000, France;2. INRA Laboratoire d’étude des Interactions Sol Agrosystème Hydrosystème (LISAH), Campus de la Gaillarde, 2 place Viala, Montpellier 34060, France;3. IRD Laboratoire d’étude des Interactions Sol Agrosystème Hydrosystème (LISAH), Campus de la Gaillarde, 2 place Viala, Montpellier 34060, France;1. Department of Physical Geography and Geoecology, University of Ostrava, Czech Republic;2. Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Geneva, Switzerland;3. Department of Earth Sciences, University of Geneva, Switzerland;1. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas (ICB), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande - FURG, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil;2. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Fisiológicas - FURG, Rio Grande, RS, Brazil;3. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Química Tecnológica e Ambiental-FURG, Brazil;4. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde-FURG, Brazil;5. Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e dell''Ambiente, Università Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy |
| |
| Abstract: | In environmental governance, there is a need to include tools that analyze the robustness of the assessment processes, as well as the validity of policies and measures. This requires a methodological framework that integrates formal techniques such as sensitivity analysis with what the authors have called social sensitivity analysis. The latter consists of participatory processes in which stakeholders analyze the robustness of the assessment process used as well as the validity of the results of such assessments. This methodology was applied to a procedure for assessing planning alternatives for forest tracks. Sensitivity analysis studies the technical robustness of the results of the assessment, as well as exploring the social validity of these results, thus facilitating processes of dialogue and consensus needed in decision-making in conflictive situations. These results are considered interesting, not only from the perspective of implanting polices, but also as a reference for other places with similar situations. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
