Fully automated FISH examination of amniotic fluid cells |
| |
Authors: | Jan Wauters Elvire Van Assche Aristidis Antsaklis James Tepperberg S Michael Sharp Michael W Kilpatrick Triantafyllos Tafas Petros Tsipouras |
| |
Institution: | 1. Department of Genetics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium;2. Department of Women's Health and Child Care, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece;3. Cytogenetics Laboratory, Laboratory Corporation of America, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA;4. Ikonisys, Inc., New Haven, CT, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Objective Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis has become a valuable adjunct in cytogenetics, providing a rapid screen for common chromosome abnormalities that is particularly helpful in prenatal diagnosis. FISH analysis using standard microscopy is expensive and labor intensive, requiring both a high skill level and subjective signal interpretation. A reliable fully automated system for FISH analysis could improve laboratory efficiency and potentially reduce errors and costs. Methods The efficacy of an automated system was compared to standard manual FISH analysis. Two sets of slides were generated from each of 152 amniotic fluid samples. Following hybridization with a standard panel of five chromosome FISH probes, one set of slides was evaluated using manual microscopy. The other set was evaluated using an automated microscopy system. Results A diagnostic outcome was obtained for all 152 samples using manual microscopy and for 146 of 152 (96%) samples using automated microscopy. Three cases of aneuploidy were detected. For those samples for which a diagnostic outcome was determined by both manual and automated microscopy, 100% concordance was observed. All FISH analysis results were confirmed by karyotype. Conclusion These data suggest that an automated microscopy system is capable of providing accurate and rapid enumeration of FISH signals in amniocytes. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
| |
Keywords: | FISH prenatal automated |
|
|