首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Consensus Building and Sustainability: Some Lessons From an Adverse Local Experience in Greece
Authors:Kalliopi?Sapountzaki  author-information"  >  author-information__contact u-icon-before"  >  mailto:sapountzaki@hua.gr"   title="  sapountzaki@hua.gr"   itemprop="  email"   data-track="  click"   data-track-action="  Email author"   data-track-label="  "  >Email author,Louis?Wassenhoven
Affiliation:(1) Department of Geography, Harokopion University of Athens, 70, El. Venizelou Str., 17671 Athens, Greece;(2) Research Laboratory for Spatial planning and Urban Development, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Architecture, National Technical University of Athens, 9, Iroon Polytechneiou, Zografos, Athens, 15773, Greece
Abstract:The paper focuses on the example of a local island community in Greece, to illustrate the difficulties of effective consensus building, in support of sustainable policies. In the first section the issue of sustainability and the importance of participation are discussed, before moving to a brief outline of the nature of participation and its sources since the 1960s. It follows an analysis of the epistemological framework of consensus building process which is considered as the most integrated and sophisticated version of participatory planning. This analysis serves as a background for judging the appropriateness of consensus building for the resolution of an environmental problem harassing a Greek island community. It is about the problem of water availability and management in the small Aegean island of Leros. The paper shows how illegal practices in the use of water, administrative fragmentation and confusion over knowledge of the problem and its solutions lead to divisions in the stakeholder groups and to obstacles in the way of participation. The intrinsic problems embedded in Greek (and probably not alone) society and political culture, which prevent collective action and participation, account in part for the anticipated risk of unwelcome, illegitimate outcomes of a potential consensus building process. Nevertheless, if communicative planning is to gain universal acceptance, it should first resolve some critical theoretical and practical shortcomings related to its normative, ethical and philosophical assumptions. Readers should send their comments on this paper to: BhaskarNath@aol.com within 3 months of publication of this issue.
Keywords:communicative planning  communicative rationality  consensus building  Greece  participation  sustainability  water policies in the Mediterranean region  water shortage
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号