首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Formalisation of normative knowledge for safe design
Institution:1. CRAN (Research Centre for Automatic Control), University of Nancy, BP 239, F54 506, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy Cedex, France;2. INRS (National Research and Safety Institute), Avenue de Bourgogne, BP 27, F54 501, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy Cedex, France;1. Institute for Tourism, Zagreb, Croatia;2. Ph.D. candidate in Statistics, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia;3. Faculty of Economics, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia;4. Institute for Economic Research, Ljubljana, Slovenia;1. Dalhousie University, Department of Industrial Engineering, Halifax, NS, Canada;2. Liaoning Technical University, College of Safety Science and Engineering, Huludao, Liaoning, China;3. TU Delft, Safety and Security Science Group, Faculty of Technology, Policy, and Management, Delft, the Netherlands;1. Monash University Accident Research Centre, 21 Alliance Lane, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia;2. WorkSafe Victoria, Australia;3. Centre for Human Factors and Sociotechnical Systems, University of the Sunshine Coast, Australia
Abstract:This paper presents a formal methodology for modelling knowledge included in safety standards. The use of the NIAM/ORM method addresses the problem of unprecise semantics and the misinterpretation introduced by the use of natural languages. It also allows for producing a formal model of the knowledge. This formalisation is a necessary step in order to exploit the knowledge efficiently, but is not sufficient in itself. So, we propose to restructure the normative knowledge, basing this restructuring on a generic structure of engineering views. This multi-criterion approach allows the designer to use standards much easier in this form than in their current textual expression. Furthermore, the resulting formal model of a standard can be implemented. This implementation results in the production of a Computer Aided Safety Standards Application for design (CASSA) tool. This tool allows to analyse various application scenarios, all included in the safety knowledge model, through specific user-oriented interfaces depending on each user's objective. Nevertheless, the implemented model of the safety knowledge is independent and unique with regard to these scenarios. In so doing, our contribution can concern users other than machine designers, such as valuers, standardisation experts or teachers, as well as relate to other areas dealing with standards such as the environment, toy industry, etc.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号