首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Protected area downgrading,downsizing, and degazettement as a threat to iconic protected areas
Authors:Siyu Qin  Rachel E Golden Kroner  Carly Cook  Anteneh T Tesfaw  Rowan Braybrook  Carlos Manuel Rodriguez  Claire Poelking  Michael B Mascia
Institution:1. Moore Center for Science, Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA, 22202 U.S.A.;2. School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, 25 Rainforest Walk, Clayton VIC 3800, Australia;3. Moore Center for Science, Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA, 22202 U.S.A.

Current address: Standards Evaluation and Analysis Division, United States Coast Guard (USCG), 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue, SE Washington, D.C. 20593, U.S.A.;4. Policy Center for Environment and Peace, Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA, 22202 U.S.A.;5. Policy Center for Environment and Peace, Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA, 22202 U.S.A.

Current address: Ministry of Environment and Energy, Calle 25A, San José, Costa Rica;6. Moore Center for Science, Conservation International, 2011 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA, 22202 U.S.A.

Current address: MacArthur Foundation, 140 S. Dearborn Street, Chicago, IL 60603, U.S.A.

Abstract:Protected areas (PAs) are expected to conserve nature and provide ecosystem services in perpetuity, yet widespread protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) may compromise these objectives. Even iconic protected areas are vulnerable to PADDD, although these PADDD events are often unrecognized. We identified 23 enacted and proposed PADDD events within World Natural Heritage Sites and examined the history, context, and consequences of PADDD events in 4 iconic PAs (Yosemite National Park, Arabian Oryx Sanctuary, Yasuní National Park, and Virunga National Park). Based on insights from published research and international workshops, these 4 cases revealed the diverse pressures brought on by competing interests to develop or exploit natural landscapes and the variety of mechanisms that enables PADDD. Knowledge gaps exist in understanding of the conditions through which development pressures translate to PADDD events and their impacts, partially due to a lack of comprehensive PADDD records. Future research priorities should include comprehensive regional and country-level profiles and analysis of risks, impacts, and contextual factors related to PADDD. Policy options to better govern PADDD include improving tracking and reporting of PADDD events, establishing transparent PADDD policy processes, coordinating among legal frameworks, and mitigating negative impacts of PADDD. To support PADDD research and policy reforms, enhanced human and financial capacities are needed to train local researchers and to host publicly accessible data. As the conservation community considers the achievements of Aichi Target 11 and moves toward new biodiversity targets beyond 2020, researchers, practitioners, and policy makers need to work together to better track, assess, and govern PADDD globally.
Keywords:biodiversity conservation  governance  PADDD  UNESCO  World Heritage Sites  conservación de la biodiversidad  gobernanza  PADDD  Sitios de Patrimonio Mundial  UNESCO  生物多样性保护  管治  PADDD  UNESCO  世界遗产地
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号