Female reactions to male absence after pairing in the pied flycatcher

Mating with an already mated pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) male is costly for a female. Two hypotheses explain why some females still mate with already mated males. The deception hypothesis suggests that some females mate with already mated males since it is difficult to assess perfectly the mating status of a male with separate territories (polyterritoriality). The search cost hypothesis states that females are aware of male mating status but the costs of searching for an unmated male exceed costs associated with the status of secondary female. One potential cue that could disclose a male's mating status is the existence of brief visits to the primary territory by polyterritorial males. To mimic such visits I removed the male from the territory for 60 min soon after female settlement. Only few females abandoned their mates as a consequence of male removal even though they had available unmated males close by. This result is most consistent with the deception hypothesis. Females did not use occasional male absence as a cue to avoid presumably polyterritorial males and in this respect they were not perfect in assessing males.