A dominant coalition and policy change: an analysis of shale oil and gas politics in India |
| |
Authors: | Kristin L Olofsson Juniper Katz Daniel P Costie Tanya Heikkila Christopher M Weible |
| |
Institution: | School of Public Affairs, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA |
| |
Abstract: | This paper identifies the coalitions involved in the topic of shale oil and gas development in India and identifies the circumstances surrounding a change in policy in 2013 by the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas to promote shale exploration. Using the Advocacy Coalition Framework as the theoretical lens, the data are collected primarily from newspaper articles from 2010 to 2015 to identify coalitions, including actors’ positions, priorities, and interactions. The findings show the presence of a dominant advocacy coalition in favor of shale oil and gas development with priorities about energy security and a regulatory framework. The findings indicate some internal coalition disagreement, but stronger internal coalition agreement. Policy change was preceded by a spike in disagreement internal to the dominant coalition. This paper shows how a change in a dominant coalition can precede a change in policy, offers a replicable method of identifying and measuring coalitions via newspaper content analysis, provides a rare application of the Advocacy Coalition Framework outside of North America and Western Europe, and provides evidence of support for shale oil and gas development in India. |
| |
Keywords: | Public policy environmental policy advocacy coalition framework energy policy media studies |
|
|