Environmental impact and risk assessment of mineral wastes reuse strategies: Review and critical analysis of approaches and applications |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. INSA Lyon – LAEPSI, 20 rue A. Einstein, 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex, France;2. INSA Toulouse – LIPE, 135 av. de Rangueil, 31077 Toulouse Cedex, France;3. ECOINNOVA France, 47 rue M. Flandin, 69003 Lyon Cedex 3, France;4. ENTPE – LSE, rue M.Audin, 69518 Vaulx-en-Velin Cedex, France;1. Eduardo Torroja Institute (IETcc-CSIC), C/ Serrano Galvache 4, 28033 Madrid, Spain;2. University of Extremadura (UEX-CSIC Partnering Unit), School of Civil Engineering, Avda. de la Universidad, s/n, 10071 Cáceres, Spain;1. Research Centre for Radwaste Disposal and Williamson Research Centre, School of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom;2. National Nuclear Laboratory, Chadwick House, Risley WA3 6AE, United Kingdom;3. Centre for Radiochemistry Research, School of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom;4. Diamond Light Source Ltd., Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0DE, United Kingdom;1. Università degli Studi di Torino, Dept. of Earth Sciences, Via Valperga Caluso, 35, 10125, Torino, Italy;2. IMAGEO srl.. Via Valperga Caluso, 35, 10125, Torino, Italy;3. South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences, Patteristonkatu 3 D, 50100 Mikkeli, Finland;4. Cranfield University, School of Water, Energy and Environment, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK;5. Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca, Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Piazza della Scienza, 4, 20126 Milano, Italy;1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria;2. Department of Civil Engineering, Landmark University, Omu-Aran, Nigeria |
| |
| Abstract: | In the industrial practice, the choice and evaluation of strategies of recycling and reuse of solid mineral wastes (thermal process residues, mining and quarrying wastes, construction and demolition wastes) could be based on ecological risk assessment (EcoRA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) studies also because of the substantial lack of regulations. Several methods and approaches of EcoRA and LCA have been developed so far and it is not always evident to consider a pertinent method for each application case. Furthermore, it is even less trivial to combine local and global scale results so to identify the best scenario from different alternatives.After a comprehensive review of recycling and reuse routes of mineral waste and relative legislation, this study addresses these issues by providing a detailed analysis and comparison of global and local scale impact assessment methods used in LCA and EcoRA, and finally an inventory of LCA and EcoRA studies already completed, to serve as a basis for further research. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
