Metagovernance and policy forum outputs in Swiss environmental politics |
| |
Authors: | Manuel Fischer Isabelle Schläpfer |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Environmental Social Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Water Science and Technology (Eawag), Dübendorf, Switzerland;2. Institute of Political Science, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland;3. Humanitarian &4. Conflict Response Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK |
| |
Abstract: | Policy forums are lightly institutionalized and stable forms of governance networks that include administrative authorities, interest groups, and scientists. They are said to produce different types of outputs, from simple actor coordination to position papers and implementation documents, but their productivity has also been questioned. Metagovernance strategies can improve the capability of policy forums to produce outputs. To determine how different metagovernance strategies influence the capability of forums to produce joint position papers, 29 policy forums in the Swiss environmental sector are compared through a qualitative comparative analysis. Results indicate that metagovernance strategies such as state actors as forum members or majority decision rules need to be combined with small forum size or low actor heterogeneity. Furthermore, forum foundation by the state complicates the production of position papers. |
| |
Keywords: | Policy forum collaborative governance metagovernance network management environmental position papers Switzerland |
|
|