Volatile organic compounds at swine facilities: A critical review |
| |
Authors: | Ni Ji-Qin Robarge Wayne P Xiao Changhe Heber Albert J |
| |
Affiliation: | a Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA b Department of Soil Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are regulated aerial pollutants that have environmental and health concerns. Swine operations produce and emit a complex mixture of VOCs with a wide range of molecular weights and a variety of physicochemical properties. Significant progress has been made in this area since the first experiment on VOCs at a swine facility in the early 1960s. A total of 47 research institutions in 15 North American, European, and Asian countries contributed to an increasing number of scientific publications. Nearly half of the research papers were published by U.S. institutions.Investigated major VOC sources included air inside swine barns, in headspaces of manure storages and composts, in open atmosphere above swine wastewater, and surrounding swine farms. They also included liquid swine manure and wastewater, and dusts inside and outside swine barns. Most of the sample analyses have been focusing on identification of VOC compounds and their relationship with odors. More than 500 VOCs have been identified. About 60% and 10% of the studies contributed to the quantification of VOC concentrations and emissions, respectively. The largest numbers of VOC compounds with reported concentrations in a single experimental study were 82 in air, 36 in manure, and 34 in dust samples.The relatively abundant VOC compounds that were quantified in at least two independent studies included acetic acid, butanoic acid (butyric acid), dimethyl disulfide, dimethyl sulfide, iso-valeric, p-cresol, propionic acid, skatole, trimethyl amine, and valeric acid in air. They included acetic acid, p-cresol, iso-butyric acid, butyric acid, indole, phenol, propionic acid, iso-valeric acid, and skatole in manure. In dust samples, they were acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, valeric acid, p-cresol, hexanal, and decanal. Swine facility VOCs were preferentially bound to smaller-size dusts.Identification and quantification of VOCs were restricted by using instruments based on gas Chromatography (GC) and liquid chromatography (LC) with different detectors most of which require time-consuming procedures to obtain results. Various methodologies and technologies in sampling, sample preparation, and sample analysis have been used. Only four publications reported using GC based analyzers and PTR-MS (proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry) that allowed continuous VOC measurement. Because of this, the majority of experimental studies were only performed on limited numbers of air, manure, or dust samples. Many aerial VOCs had concentrations that were too low to be identified by the GC peaks.Although VOCs emitted from swine facilities have environmental concerns, only a few studies investigated VOC emission rates, which ranged from 3.0 to 176.5 mg d−1 kg−1 pig at swine finishing barns and from 2.3 to 45.2 g d−1 m−2 at manure storages. Similar to the other pollutants, spatial and temporal variations of aerial VOC concentrations and emissions existed and were significantly affected by manure management systems, barn structural designs, and ventilation rates.Scientific research in this area has been mainly driven by odor nuisance, instead of environment or health concerns. Compared with other aerial pollutants in animal agriculture, the current scientific knowledge about VOCs at swine facilities is still very limited and far from sufficient to develop reliable emission factors. |
| |
Keywords: | APHA, American Public Health Association ARS, Agricultural Research Service ASD, amperometric sulfur detector BOD5, biological oxygen demand over 5-day period CAA, Clean Air Act CERCLA, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act CDFB, complete-data-full-barn COD, chemical oxygen demand DFID, dual-flame ionization detector EPA, Environmental Protection Agency EPCRA, Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act FID, flame ionization detection ECD, electron capture detector GC, gas chromatography GLC, gas-liquid chromatography HCH, hexachlorocyclohexane HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography HC, hydrocarbon HS, headspace solid phase IEC, ion-exclusion chromatography ITD, ion trap detector IUPAC, International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry LC, liquid chromatography MDGC, multidimensional gas chromatography MIMS, membrane inlet mass spectrometry MS, mass spectrometry MSD, mass selection detector NMHC, non-methane hydrocarbon NRC, National Research Council NVOC, non-volatile organic compound O, olfactometry PAH, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon Paper-C, paper chromatography PCB, polychlorinated biphenyl PFPD, pulsed flame photometric PM, particulate matters PTR-MS, proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry SVOC, semi-volatile organic compound SP, spectrophotometer SPME, solid phase micro-extraction TD, thermo-conductivity detector TD-GC, thermal desorption gas chromatography TLC, thin-layer chromatography TDU, thermal desorption unity TOA, total organic acid VFA, volatile fatty acid VIC, volatile inorganic compound VOC, volatile organic compound |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录! |
|