首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Volatile organic compounds at swine facilities: A critical review
Authors:Ni Ji-Qin  Robarge Wayne P  Xiao Changhe  Heber Albert J
Affiliation:a Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
b Department of Soil Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
Abstract:Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are regulated aerial pollutants that have environmental and health concerns. Swine operations produce and emit a complex mixture of VOCs with a wide range of molecular weights and a variety of physicochemical properties. Significant progress has been made in this area since the first experiment on VOCs at a swine facility in the early 1960s. A total of 47 research institutions in 15 North American, European, and Asian countries contributed to an increasing number of scientific publications. Nearly half of the research papers were published by U.S. institutions.Investigated major VOC sources included air inside swine barns, in headspaces of manure storages and composts, in open atmosphere above swine wastewater, and surrounding swine farms. They also included liquid swine manure and wastewater, and dusts inside and outside swine barns. Most of the sample analyses have been focusing on identification of VOC compounds and their relationship with odors. More than 500 VOCs have been identified. About 60% and 10% of the studies contributed to the quantification of VOC concentrations and emissions, respectively. The largest numbers of VOC compounds with reported concentrations in a single experimental study were 82 in air, 36 in manure, and 34 in dust samples.The relatively abundant VOC compounds that were quantified in at least two independent studies included acetic acid, butanoic acid (butyric acid), dimethyl disulfide, dimethyl sulfide, iso-valeric, p-cresol, propionic acid, skatole, trimethyl amine, and valeric acid in air. They included acetic acid, p-cresol, iso-butyric acid, butyric acid, indole, phenol, propionic acid, iso-valeric acid, and skatole in manure. In dust samples, they were acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, valeric acid, p-cresol, hexanal, and decanal. Swine facility VOCs were preferentially bound to smaller-size dusts.Identification and quantification of VOCs were restricted by using instruments based on gas Chromatography (GC) and liquid chromatography (LC) with different detectors most of which require time-consuming procedures to obtain results. Various methodologies and technologies in sampling, sample preparation, and sample analysis have been used. Only four publications reported using GC based analyzers and PTR-MS (proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry) that allowed continuous VOC measurement. Because of this, the majority of experimental studies were only performed on limited numbers of air, manure, or dust samples. Many aerial VOCs had concentrations that were too low to be identified by the GC peaks.Although VOCs emitted from swine facilities have environmental concerns, only a few studies investigated VOC emission rates, which ranged from 3.0 to 176.5 mg d−1 kg−1 pig at swine finishing barns and from 2.3 to 45.2 g d−1 m−2 at manure storages. Similar to the other pollutants, spatial and temporal variations of aerial VOC concentrations and emissions existed and were significantly affected by manure management systems, barn structural designs, and ventilation rates.Scientific research in this area has been mainly driven by odor nuisance, instead of environment or health concerns. Compared with other aerial pollutants in animal agriculture, the current scientific knowledge about VOCs at swine facilities is still very limited and far from sufficient to develop reliable emission factors.
Keywords:APHA, American Public Health Association   ARS, Agricultural Research Service   ASD, amperometric sulfur detector   BOD5, biological oxygen demand over 5-day period   CAA, Clean Air Act   CERCLA, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act   CDFB, complete-data-full-barn   COD, chemical oxygen demand   DFID, dual-flame ionization detector   EPA, Environmental Protection Agency   EPCRA, Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act   FID, flame ionization detection   ECD, electron capture detector   GC, gas chromatography   GLC, gas-liquid chromatography   HCH, hexachlorocyclohexane   HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography   HC, hydrocarbon   HS, headspace solid phase   IEC, ion-exclusion chromatography   ITD, ion trap detector   IUPAC, International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry   LC, liquid chromatography   MDGC, multidimensional gas chromatography   MIMS, membrane inlet mass spectrometry   MS, mass spectrometry   MSD, mass selection detector   NMHC, non-methane hydrocarbon   NRC, National Research Council   NVOC, non-volatile organic compound   O, olfactometry   PAH, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon   Paper-C, paper chromatography   PCB, polychlorinated biphenyl   PFPD, pulsed flame photometric   PM, particulate matters   PTR-MS, proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry   SVOC, semi-volatile organic compound   SP, spectrophotometer   SPME, solid phase micro-extraction   TD, thermo-conductivity detector   TD-GC, thermal desorption gas chromatography   TLC, thin-layer chromatography   TDU, thermal desorption unity   TOA, total organic acid   VFA, volatile fatty acid   VIC, volatile inorganic compound   VOC, volatile organic compound
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号