首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Boundary layer photochemistry simulated with a two-stream convection scheme
Institution:1. California Institute of Technology, Division of Geology and Planetary Sciences, 1200 E California Blvd, MC 100-23, 91125 Pasadena, CA, United States;2. Department of Lithosphere Dynamics, Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ, German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany;3. Institute of Geology, University of Innsbruck (Austria), Innrain 52, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria;4. Department of Land Use Planning and Climate Adaptation, Swedish Geotechnical Institute, SE-581 93 Linköping, Sweden;1. School of Marine Science and Engineering, Plymouth University, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK;2. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth PL1 3DH, UK;1. Instituto de Matemática Interdisciplinar, Departamento de Matemática Aplicada, Facultad de Ciencias Matemáticas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain;2. National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, Middlesex, UK;3. The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Division of Animal, Food and Health Sciences, Werribee, Victoria, Australia
Abstract:We explore the sensitivity of the simulation of photochemical smog to the turbulent mixing scheme, using two diffusion schemes and an original two-stream model (TSM) scheme, assuming in the column an updraft and a downdraft. In this latter scheme both updraft and downdraft concentrations are prognostic variables, unlike in previously proposed schemes. The comparisons are made using a one-dimensional column model, in a Eulerian or a Lagrangian mode. The diffusion schemes produce tilted concentration profiles for primary species, with higher concentrations near the surface and lower values at the top of the boundary layer, while TSM profiles yield more homogeneous concentrations in the planetary boundary layer (PBL). Ozone concentrations are also more homogeneous in the TSM PBL than in the diffusive PBL. Only deposition makes ozone concentrations slightly lower near the surface, while in diffusive case ozone is lower also due to titration by higher nitrogen oxide concentrations. The overall differences between the schemes remain small for ozone.Also, the development time and amplitude of an ozone city plume is not very sensitive to the choice of the mixing scheme. In the urban framework ozone build-up is slightly delayed by higher nitrogen oxide concentrations near the surface in the diffusive cases, but the plume development is similar to that of the TSM once the plume travels away from the emission area. Results also show that the sensitivity of ozone to nitrogen oxide and non-methane volatile organic compounds is itself not very sensitive to the mixing scheme.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号