面向工业园区废水臭氧氧化深度处理性能评价的模型污染物选择与评估

臭氧氧化近年来逐渐成为废水深度处理主要工艺之一.在臭氧氧化深度水处理技术创新的过程中,研发人员需要对大量臭氧氧化新技术、新装置和新材料等进行废水深度处理性能评价,然而常为选择何种模型污染物能够预估其深度处理实际废水时化学需氧量(COD)/总有机碳(TOC)削减方面的性能而困扰.现有研究选用的众多模型污染物能够在何种程度上代表实际废水深度处理时COD/TOC削减方面的特性尚不明确.面向废水深度处理的模型污染物选择与评估对臭氧氧化深度水处理技术标准体系的构建具有意义.对19种模型污染物溶液(无缓冲水溶液和碳酸氢盐缓冲溶液)和4种工业园区废水的二级出水进行臭氧氧化处理,对其有机物总量削减的相似性通过聚类分析等方法进行评估.结果表明,模型污染物溶液经过臭氧氧化处理的有机物总量削减率的差异性大于4种实际废水间的差异,从而为筛选模型污染物用于臭氧氧化深度水处理技术性能评价提供了可能.采用酮基布洛芬、 2,4-二氯苯氧乙酸和磺胺二甲基嘧啶的无缓冲水溶液,以及非那西汀、磺胺二甲基嘧啶和三氯蔗糖的碳酸氢盐缓冲溶液预测3种工业园区二沉池出水臭氧处理60 min COD削减率的误差不超过9%以及5%.模型污...

Selection and Evaluation of Model Pollutants for Performance Assessment of Advanced Treatment of Industrial Park Wastewater by Ozonation

Ozonation has gradually become a routine process for advanced wastewater treatment. During the technology innovation on the advanced treatment of wastewater by ozonation, researchers have to assess the performance of abundant new technologies, new reactors, and new materials. However, they are usually puzzled by the rational selection of model pollutants to assess the capability of such new technologies to eliminate the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total organic carbon (TOC) of practical wastewater. It is unclear how well the various model pollutants reported in the literature could represent the COD/TOC removal of actual wastewater. The rational selection and evaluation of model pollutants for advanced treatment of industrial wastewater is of great significance in establishing the technological standard system for advanced treatment of wastewater via ozonation. Herein, the aqueous solutions (including unbuffered solutions and bicarbonate-buffered solutions) of 19 model pollutants and four practical secondary effluents from industrial parks were investigated through ozonation under identical conditions. The similarity in COD/TOC removal of the above wastewater/solutions were evaluated using mainly clustering analysis. The results showed that the dissimilarity among the model pollutants was greater than that among the actual wastewaters, thus enabling the rational selection of several model pollutants to assess the performance of advanced treatment of wastewater using ozonation by different technologies. The errors of predicting the COD removal of secondary sedimentation tank effluent by ozonation in 60 min using the unbuffered aqueous solutions of ketoprofen (KTP), dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), and sulfamethazine (SMT) were less than 9%, and those using the bicarbonate-buffered solutions of phenacetin (PNT), SMT, and sucralose were less than 5%. The evolution of pH by using the bicarbonate-buffered solutions was more similar to that in practical wastewater than by using unbuffered aqueous solutions. In the similarity evaluation of COD/TOC removal between the bicarbonate-buffered solutions and the practical wastewaters, the results were almost the same whether considering different input ozone concentration conditions. Therefore, the protocol proposed in this study based on similarity evaluation to assess the performance treating actual wastewater could be extended to different ozone concentration conditions with certain universality.