首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

铬污染土壤的还原稳定化修复
引用本文:张辉, 付融冰, 郭小品, 宋召凤, 陈小华. 铬污染土壤的还原稳定化修复[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(11): 6163-6168. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201702022
作者姓名:张辉  付融冰  郭小品  宋召凤  陈小华
作者单位:1.上海市环境科学研究院, 上海 200233; 2.环境科学与工程学院, 污染控制与资源化研究国家重点实验室, 同济大学, 上海 200092
基金项目:上海市自然科学基金资助项目(07ZR14090) 上海市环保科研重大项目(沪环科(2013-04)) 上海市环保科研青年基金项目(沪环科(2015-105)) 上海领军人才项目(011)
摘    要:以湖南某工业场地的铬污染土壤为修复对象,投加不同比例的FeSO4·7H2O、FeSO4·7H2O和Ca(OH)2混合物及NaHSO3,通过测定土壤及浸出液中六价铬、总铬以及铬的形态,比较3种稳定剂对该污染土壤的还原稳定化作用。结果表明,FeSO4·7H2O和NaHSO3对铬污染土壤的还原稳定效果都较好,可以有效还原土壤中六价铬并能降低土壤中总铬的浸出浓度。当FeSO4·7H2O投加量为2%时,土壤六价铬和总铬浸出浓度降幅分别达到99.0%和57.5%;当NaHSO3投加量为0.8%时,六价铬和总铬浸出浓度降幅分别达到97.7%和42.2%,与前二者相比,FeSO4·7H2O和Ca(OH)2混合物还原稳定化效果较差。投加FeSO4·7H2O能够将土壤中活性大的可交换态和碳酸盐态铬转化为稳定的有机态和残渣态铬;而NaHSO3主要将可交换态和碳酸盐态铬转化为相对稳定的铁锰氧化态铬,其稳定化效果要差于FeSO4·7H2O。

关 键 词:   六价铬   稳定化   重金属形态
收稿时间:2017-06-12

Experimental research onstabilization remediation of chromium contaminated soil
ZHANG Hui, FU Rongbing, GUO Xiaopin, SONG Zhaofeng, CHEN Xiaohua. Experimental research onstabilization remediation of chromium contaminated soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(11): 6163-6168. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201702022
Authors:ZHANG Hui  FU Rongbing  GUO Xiaopin  SONG Zhaofeng  CHEN Xiaohua
Affiliation:1.Shanghai Academy of Environmental Sciences, Shanghai 200233, China; 2.College of Environmental Science and Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Abstract:Different proportions of FeSO4·7H2O, mixture of FeSO4·7H2O and Ca(OH)2 and NaHSO3, were added in the chromium polluted soil collected from an industrial area in Hunan Province. The efficiencies of 3 different stabilizers on the remediation of chromium contaminated soil were compared based on the contents of hexavalent chromium, total chromium and chromium of different forms in soil and leaching liquids. The results show that both FeSO4·7H2Oand NaHSO3 can effectively reduce the leaching concentration of hexavalent chromium and total chromium. When dosing quantity of FeSO4·7H2O was 2%, reduction of hexavalent chromium and total chromium in the leaching liquid of the contaminated soil were 99.0% and 57.5%, respectively.When dosing quantity of NaHSO3 was 0.8%, reduction of hexavalent chromium and total chromium in the leaching liquids of the contaminated soil were 97.7% and 42.2%, respectively. Compared with the former two stabilizers, stabilization effect of the mixture of FeSO4·7H2O and Ca(OH)2 was poor. FeSO4·7H2O can transform the active exchangeable and carbonate chromium to the stable organic and residual chromium;NaHSO3 can mainly transform exchangeable and carbonate chromium to the relatively stable manganese-iron combination state, which is the reason why its stabilization efficiency is worse than FeSO4·7H2O.
Keywords:chromium  hexavalent chromium  stabilization  heavy metal form
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境工程学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号