首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

硫化钠法和亚铁法处理印制线路板络合铜废水对比研究
引用本文:蔡辰, 王宏杰, 董文艺. 硫化钠法和亚铁法处理印制线路板络合铜废水对比研究[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(1): 297-302. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201508184
作者姓名:蔡辰  王宏杰  董文艺
作者单位:1. 哈尔滨工业大学深圳研究生院深圳市水资源利用与环境污染控制重点实验室, 深圳 518055; 2. 哈尔滨工业大学城市水资源与水环境国家重点实验室, 哈尔滨 150090
基金项目:深圳市技术研究开发计划(CXZZ20130319100941767)
摘    要:印制线路板生产过程中会排放各类废水,其中的综合废水中含有络合铜化合物。目前针对络合铜的去除,硫化钠法和亚铁法的研究较为成熟。然而,现有的研究主要针对于某一方法的优化,并没有从工程应用的角度对2种方法进行一个全面的经济技术比较。针对含络合铜废水,在优化了硫化钠法和亚铁法的操作条件的基础上,结合药剂成本和产生污泥的处理成本,从经济和技术角度对比了2种方法。结果表明,硫化钠法药剂费和污泥处理费成本为2.25元·t-1,低于亚铁法的2.68元·t-1,而基建费用和运行风险则高于亚铁法。

关 键 词:含铜废水   硫化钠法   亚铁法
收稿时间:2015-12-25

Comparative study of sodium sulfide method and ferrous method for removing chelated copper from printed circuit board wastewater
CAI Chen, WANG Hongjie, DONG Wenyi. Comparative study of sodium sulfide method and ferrous method for removing chelated copper from printed circuit board wastewater[J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(1): 297-302. doi: 10.12030/j.cjee.201508184
Authors:CAI Chen  WANG Hongjie  DONG Wenyi
Affiliation:1. Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Water Resource Application and Environmental Pollution Control, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen 518055, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China
Abstract:Comprehensive wastewater, which is effluent from the printed circuit board (PCB) manufacturing process, contains chelated-copper compounds. For chelated-copper removal, two well-developed methods exist:the sodium sulfide method and the ferrous method. However, the research currently discusses these methods individually, and no economic and technical comparisons between the two have been done. In this paper, we developed a comparative study of the sodium sulfide and ferrous methods from operating optimization and economic-technical perspectives, especially for the output of sludge. The results showed that the cost of the sodium sulfide method (2.25 yuan·t-1) was lower than it was for the ferrous method (2.68 yuan·t-1). Nevertheless, the capital expenditure and control risk of the sodium sulfide method were higher than they were for the ferrous method.
Keywords:copper wastewater  sodium sulfide method  ferrous method
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境工程学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境工程学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号