Microplastic contamination in Great Lakes fish |
| |
Authors: | Keenan Munno Paul A. Helm Chelsea Rochman Tara George Donald A. Jackson |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;2. Environmental Monitoring & Reporting Branch, Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, Toronto, Ontario, Canada School of the Environment, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;3. Environmental Monitoring & Reporting Branch, Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, Toronto, Ontario, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | Freshwater ecosystems, generally adjacent to human population and more contaminated relative to adjacent marine ecosystems, are vulnerable to microplastic contamination. We sampled 7 species of fish from Lake Ontario and Lake Superior and assessed their gastrointestinal (GI) tracts to quantify ingested microplastics and other anthropogenic particles. A subset of the microparticles were chemically analyzed to confirm polymer types and anthropogenic origins. We documented the highest concentration of microplastics and other anthropogenic microparticles ever reported in bony fish. We found 12,442 anthropogenic microparticles across 212 fish (8 species) from nearshore Lake Ontario, 943 across 50 fish (1 species) from Humber River, and 3094 across 119 fish (7 species) from Lake Superior. Fish from Lake Ontario had the greatest mean abundance of anthropogenic microparticles in their GI tracts (59 particles/fish [SD 104]), with up to 915 microparticles in a single fish. Fish from Lake Superior contained a mean [SD] of 26 [74] particles/fish, and fish from Humber River contained 19 [14] particles/fish. Most particles were microfibers. Overall, ≥90% of particles were anthropogenic, of which 35-59% were microplastics. Polyethylene (24%), polyethylene terephthalate (20%), and polypropylene (18%) were the most common microplastics. Ingestion of anthropogenic particles was significantly different among species within Lake Ontario (p < 0.05), and the abundance of anthropogenic particles increased as fish length increased in Lake Ontario (ρ = 0.62). Although we cannot extrapolate the concentration of microplastics in the water and sediments of these fish, the relatively high abundance of microplastics in the GI tracts of fish suggests environmental exposure may be above threshold concentrations for risk. |
| |
Keywords: | anthropogenic particle freshwater Great Lake ingestion microplastics plastics agua dulce Grandes Lagos ingesta microplásticos partícula antropogénica plásticos |
|
|