首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Rapid assessment of insect pollination services to inform decision-making
Authors:Fabrizia Ratto  Tom D Breeze  Lorna J Cole  Michael P D Garratt  David Kleijn  Bill Kunin  Denis Michez  Rory O'Connor  Jeff Ollerton  Robert J Paxton  Guy M Poppy  Simon G Potts  Deepa Senapathi  Rosalind Shaw  Lynn V Dicks  Kelvin S-H Peh
Institution:1. School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK;2. Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading, UK;3. Integrated Land Management, Environment & Society, SRUC, Ayr, UK;4. Resource Ecology Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands;5. School of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK;6. Laboratoire de Zoologie, Université de Mons, Mons, Belgium;7. Faculty of Arts, Science and Technology, University of Northampton, Northampton, UK;8. General Zoology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany

German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany;9. Environment and Sustainability Institute, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK;10. Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK;11. School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

Abstract:Pollinator declines have prompted efforts to assess how land-use change affects insect pollinators and pollination services in agricultural landscapes. Yet many tools to measure insect pollination services require substantial landscape-scale data and technical expertise. In expert workshops, 3 straightforward methods (desk-based method, field survey, and empirical manipulation with exclusion experiments) for rapid insect pollination assessment at site scale were developed to provide an adaptable framework that is accessible to nonspecialist with limited resources. These methods were designed for TESSA (Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-Based Assessment) and allow comparative assessment of pollination services at a site of conservation interest and in its most plausible alternative state (e.g., converted to agricultural land). We applied the methods at a nature reserve in the United Kingdom to estimate the value of insect pollination services provided by the reserve. The economic value of pollination services provided by the reserve ranged from US$6163 to US$11,546/year. The conversion of the reserve to arable land would provide no insect pollination services and a net annual benefit from insect-pollinated crop production of approximately $1542/year (US$24?ha–1?year–1). The methods had wide applicability and were readily adapted to different insect-pollinated crops: rape (Brassica napus) and beans (Vicia faba) crops. All methods were rapidly employed under a low budget. The relatively less robust methods that required fewer resources yielded higher estimates of annual insect pollination benefit.
Keywords:dependency ratio  ecosystem services  exclusion experiment  field beans  insect pollinators  oilseed rape  TESSA  visitation frequency  colza  experimento de exclusión  frecuencia de visita  haba común  índice de dependencia  insectos polinizadores  servicios ambientales  TESSA  依赖率  生态系统服务  排除性实验  蚕豆  昆虫授粉者  油菜  生态系统服务站点评估工具包(TESSA)  访花频率
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号