首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Uranium in drinking-water: A unique case of guideline value increases and discrepancies between chemical and radiochemical guidelines
Institution:1. CEA/DEN/DRCP/CETAMA, Marcoule, F-30207 Bagnols-sur-Cèze, France;2. CEA/DSV/PROSITON, Cadarache, F-13115 Saint Paul-lez-Durance, France;3. CEA/DSV/IBEB/SBTN, Marcoule, F-30207 Bagnols-sur-Cèze, France;1. Mine Water Re-Search Group, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa,;2. Mine Water Re-Search Group, Geotechnical Environmental Specialists, Groenkloof, Pretoria, South Africa,;3. Helmoltz Centre Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute for Resource Ecology, Bio-Geochemical Laboratory, Germany,;1. CEA, CNRS, Aix-Marseille Université, UMR 7265 Biologie Végétale et Microbiologie Environnementales, Laboratoire des Interactions Protéine Métal, 13108 Saint-Paul-lez-Durance, France;2. Laboratoire Innovations technologiques pour la Détection et le Diagnostic (Li2D), Service de Pharmacologie et Immunoanalyse (SPI), CEA, INRA, F-30207 Bagnols sur Cèze, France;3. CEA, CNRS, Aix-Marseille Université, UMR 7265 Biologie Végétale et Microbiologie Environnementales, Laboratoire d''écologie microbienne de la rhizosphère et d''environnements extrêmes, 13108 Saint-Paul-lez-Durance, France
Abstract:BackgroundUranium represents a unique case for an element naturally present in the environment, as its chemical guideline value in drinking water significantly increased from 2 μg/L in 1998 up to 15 μg/L in 2004 and then to 30 μg/L in 2011, to date corresponding to a multiplication factor of 15 within a period of just 13 years.ObjectivesIn this commentary we summarize the evolution of uranium guideline values in drinking-water based on both radiological and chemical aspects, emphasizing the benefit of human studies and their contribution to recent recommendations. We also propose a simpler and better consistency between radiological and chemical values.DiscussionThe current chemical guideline value of 30 μg/L is still designated as provisional because of scientific uncertainties regarding uranium toxicity. During the same period, the radiological guideline for 238U increased from 4 Bq/L to 10 Bq/L while that for 234U decreased from 4 Bq/L to 1 Bq/L. These discrepancies are discussed here, and a value of 1 Bq/L for all uranium isotopes is proposed to be more consistent with the current chemical value of 30 μg/L.ConclusionContinuous progress in the domains of toxicology and speciation should enable a better interpretation of the biological effects of uranium in correlation with epidemiological human studies. This will certainly aid future proposals for uranium guideline values.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号