首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Temporal trends of perfluorooctanesulfonate isomer and enantiomer patterns in archived Swedish and American serum samples
Institution:1. Division of Analytical & Environmental Toxicology, Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2G3, Alberta, Canada;2. Norwegian Institute for Air Research, Hjalmar Johansens gt. 14, Tromsø NO-9296, Norway;3. Department of Applied Environmental Science, Stockholm University, Stockholm SE-106 91, Sweden;4. 3M Company, Medical Department, St. Paul 55144, MN, USA;5. Department of Risk and Benefit Assessment, National Food Agency, Uppsala SE-751 26, Sweden;1. Neurochemistry Laboratory, Department of Clinical Chemistry, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;2. Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;3. Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;1. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 2871, Beijing, 100085, China;2. DuPont Central Research and Development?Biotechnology, Wilmington, DE 19880, USA
Abstract:Human perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) body burdens are attributable to both direct PFOS and indirect PFOS precursor (PreFOS) exposure. The relative importance of these two pathways has been estimated, but the relative temporal trajectory of exposure to PFOS and PreFOS has not been examined. Here, two hypothesized biomarkers of PreFOS exposure, PFOS isomer profiles (quantified as percent branched PFOS, %br-PFOS) and chiral 1m-PFOS enantiomer fractions (1m-PFOS EF) were analyzed in archived human serum samples of individual American adults (1974–2010) and pooled samples of Swedish primiparous women (1996–2010). After correcting for potential confounders, significant correlations between %br-PFOS and 1m-PFOS EFs were observed in American samples and in Swedish samples for the 1996–2000 period, supporting the hypothesis that both %br-PFOS and 1m-PFOS EF are biomarkers of PreFOS exposure. Significant trends of increasing %br-PFOS, from 2000 to 2010, and increasingly non-racemic 1m-PFOS EFs, from 1996 to 2000, were detected in Swedish samples. No statistically significant trend for %br-PFOS or 1m-PFOS EF was observed in American samples, but American males had significantly higher %br-PFOS and significantly lower 1m-PFOS EF (i.e. more non-racemic) than females, and a similar significant difference was shown in the older age group, relative to the younger age group. These temporal trends in %br-PFOS and 1m-PFOS EF are not easily explained and the results highlight uncertainties about how humans are exposed to PFOS.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号