首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于实测的燃煤电厂细颗粒物排放特性分析与研究
引用本文:王圣,朱法华,王慧敏,左漪,孙雪丽,赵秀勇,陈辉,刘钢. 基于实测的燃煤电厂细颗粒物排放特性分析与研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2011, 31(3): 630-635
作者姓名:王圣  朱法华  王慧敏  左漪  孙雪丽  赵秀勇  陈辉  刘钢
作者单位:1. 国电环境保护研究院,南京,210031;河海大学水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室,南京,210098
2. 国电环境保护研究院,南京,210031
3. 河海大学水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室,南京,210098
基金项目:国家能源局基金资助项目(No.20090417)
摘    要:选取我国6个有代表性的燃煤电厂对烟尘、PM10和PM2.5的排放情况进行实测,根据所测数据计算各电厂对烟尘、PM10和PM2.5除尘效率以及排放因子,并分析得到其排放特性.6个受检燃煤电厂静电除尘及湿法脱硫设备对烟尘总除尘效率最高为99.88%,最低为99.75%,平均去除率为99.82%;除尘前,烟气中PM10含量范...

关 键 词:实测  燃煤电厂  PM10  PM2.5  排放特征  排放因子
收稿时间:2010-06-05
修稿时间:2010-08-16

Fine particle emission characteristics from coal-fired power plants based on field tests
WANG Sheng,ZHU Fahu,WANG Huimin,ZUO Yi,SUN Xueli,ZHAO Xiuyong,CHEN Hui and LIU Gang. Fine particle emission characteristics from coal-fired power plants based on field tests[J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2011, 31(3): 630-635
Authors:WANG Sheng  ZHU Fahu  WANG Huimin  ZUO Yi  SUN Xueli  ZHAO Xiuyong  CHEN Hui  LIU Gang
Affiliation:1. State Power Environmental Protection Research Institute, Nanjing 210031; 2. State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resource and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098,State Power Environmental Protection Research Institute, Nanjing 210031,State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resource and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098,State Power Environmental Protection Research Institute, Nanjing 210031,State Power Environmental Protection Research Institute, Nanjing 210031,State Power Environmental Protection Research Institute, Nanjing 210031,State Power Environmental Protection Research Institute, Nanjing 210031 and State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resource and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098
Abstract:Six representative coal-fired power plants were selected and monitored for the PM10 and PM2.5 emission from these plants. The dust, PM10 and PM2.5 removal efficiencies and emission factors can be calculated based on the monitoring results, and the emission characteristics can be analyzed. The highest total dust removal efficiency among the 6 examined power plants through ESP (electrostatic precipitator) and FGD (flue gas desulfurization) is 99.88%, while the lowest efficiency is 99.75%, and the average efficiency is 99.82%. Before the ESP procedure, PM10/TSP is 20.93%~34.98%, and the average is 25.60%; PM2.5/TSP is 2.84%~4.14%, and the average is 3.39%. After the ESP and FGD procedure, PM10/TSP is 87.54%~95.90%, and the average is 91.57%; PM2.5/TSP is 41.22%~50.31%, and the average is 46.14%. PM2.5/PM10 increases from 10.74%~15.90% to 42.99%~55.14%, and the average is from 13.48% to 50.45%. The PM10 removal rate is 98.88%~99.62%, and the average is 99.29% after the ESP and FGD procedure, while the PM2.5 removal rate is 95.68%~98.47%, and the average is 97.41%. Comparing with the coal-fired power plants abroad, the 6 examined power plants have slightly larger dust emission factors than Canada and the United States in terms of kg·MWh-1 and kg·t-1. However, the PM10 and PM2.5 emission factors are much larger than in Canada and the US.
Keywords:PM10  PM2.5
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号