Does the potential of the use of LCA match the design team needs? |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. SUPMECA - Toulon, Laboratoire d''Ingénierie des Structures Mécaniques et Matériaux, Quartier Mayol, 83000 Toulon, France;2. Politecnico di Torino, Disegno Industriale, Dipartimento di Progettazione Architettonica, viale Mattioli, 39, 10125 Torino, Italy;3. Université de Montréal, Faculté de l''aménagement, Ecole de design, CP 6128 succursale Centre ville, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3C3J7;1. ISC, Edinburgh Napier University, UK;2. ISA, School of Physics A28, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia;1. CSRA Inc., USA;2. Department of Econometrics and Operations Research, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands;3. Department of Industrial Ecology, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, The Netherlands;4. Department of Sustainable Development, Environmental Science and Engineering, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden;5. Department of Bioeconomy and Systems Analysis, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation, Poland;1. Institute of Systems Sciences, Innovation and Sustainability Research, University of Graz, Merangasse 18/I, 8010 Graz, Austria;2. MAGNA Steyr Engineering AG & Co KG, Graz, Austria |
| |
| Abstract: | Today, most people involved in the industrial engineering community (consultants, manufacturers, researchers and institutional actors) assert that Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is the most successful tool to assess environmental considerations in the product design process. This assertion is addressed in this article through a simultaneous check of the potential of this tool and the environmental needs of the design team. After a comparison of this potential to these needs, the following assertions may be made: (1) LCA is not an adequate tool for the designer, because its utility in the design process is limited to an analysis of existing products or well defined products at the final stages of the design process, and (2) LCA is not useful in creating a learning dynamic (awareness) within the company, because it does not improve the legitimacy or the credibility of environmental considerations. Moreover, it may generate confusion within the design team while restricting the capacity for innovation within the company. This paper concludes that, in the product design field, the LCA tool should be considered as a specialized tool handled by a specific player (the environmental actor) and should be dedicated to the strategic evaluation of new concepts. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
