首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

缓释复合肥在不同土壤水分条件下氨挥发特性研究
引用本文:胡小凤,王正银,游媛,李精超.缓释复合肥在不同土壤水分条件下氨挥发特性研究[J].环境科学,2010,31(8):1937-1943.
作者姓名:胡小凤  王正银  游媛  李精超
作者单位:胡小凤,HU Xiao-feng(西南大学资源环境学院,重庆400716;盘锦市农业技术推广站,盘锦,124010);王正银,游媛,WANG Zheng-yin,YOU Yuan(西南大学资源环境学院,重庆,400716);李精超,LI Jing-chao(盘锦市环境科学研究院,盘锦,124010) 
基金项目:国家科技支撑计划项目,科技部农业科技成果转化资金项目,国家高技术研究发展计划(863)项目 
摘    要:采用"通气法"室内培养试验研究了非包膜缓释复合肥(SRF)在不同土壤水分条件下的氨挥发损失状况和动力学特性以及盆栽试验条件下水稻生长和氮素利用效率.结果表明,SRF在淹水条件下氨挥发比不淹水处理提前3~4d到达峰值;且峰值和累积氨挥发量也比不淹水培养条件下高.与普通复合肥(CCF)相比,缓释复合肥的氨挥发损失量显著降低,不淹水条件下比等氮量CCF减少氨挥发50.6%和22.8%,淹水条件下比等氮量CCF减少氨挥发24.2%和10.4%,但是其氨挥发损失显著高于包膜缓释肥料(CRF).SRF的氨累积挥发量随施肥水平的增加而增大,其动力学特性可用一级动力学方程、Elovich方程和抛物线扩散方程定量描述.SRF、CCF和CRF各施肥处理在淹水条件下的水稻植株生物量分别比不淹水条件增加67.86%、78.25%和48.75%;氮素利用率分别比不淹水处理增加57.73%、80.70%和12.06%.在不淹水和淹水2种土壤水分条件下,施用SRF处理氮素利用率分别比CCF增加59.10%和10.40%.SRF能够降低氨挥发,提高植株生物量和氮素利用率.

关 键 词:缓释肥料  氨挥发  通气法  动力学特性  土壤水分
收稿时间:2009/10/9 0:00:00
修稿时间:2/8/2010 12:00:00 AM

Ammonia Volatilization of Slow Release Compound Fertilizer in Different Soils Water Conditions
HU Xiao-feng,WANG Zheng-yin,YOU Yuan and LI Jing-chao.Ammonia Volatilization of Slow Release Compound Fertilizer in Different Soils Water Conditions[J].Chinese Journal of Environmental Science,2010,31(8):1937-1943.
Authors:HU Xiao-feng  WANG Zheng-yin  YOU Yuan and LI Jing-chao
Institution:College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400716, China. huxiaofeng81@163.com
Abstract:By using venting method incubation experiment, we studied the ammonia volatilization and kinetics characteristics of uncoated slowed release compound fertilizer (SRF) under different soil water conditions and the growth and nitrogen utilization efficiency of rice in pot experiment. Results indicated that the ammonia volatilization of SRF under waterflooding reached the peak ahead of 3-4 days compared to the moist treatment. The peak and accumulation of ammonia volatilization in the waterflooding treatments were higher than those under the moist condition. SRF could significantly reduce total ammonia volatilization compared to the common compound fertilizer (CCF), reduced by 50.6% and 22.8% in the moist treatment and reduced by 24.2% and 10.4% in the waterflooding treatment,but the loss of ammonia volatilization of SRF was higher significantly than that of the coated fertilizer (CRF). Ammonia volatilization increased with the increasing of fertilizer application. The dynamics of ammonia volatilization of SRF could be quantitatively described with three equations: the first order kinetics equation, Elovich equation and parabola equation. Compared to moist condition, the biomass of rice plant in SRF, CCF and SRF treatments increased by 67.86%, 78.25% and 48.75%, and nitrogen utilization efficiency increased by 57.73%, 80.70% and 12.06% under waterflooding condition, respectively. Comparing with CCF, nitrogen utilization efficiency in SRF treatment improved by 59.10% and 10.40% under two soil moisture conditions. SRF could reduce ammonia volatilization and improve biomass and nitrogen utilization efficiency.
Keywords:slow release fertilizer    ammonia volatilization    venting method    kinetics characteristics    soil moisture
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 PubMed 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号