Air Traffic Management accident risk. Part 2: Repairing the deficiencies of ESARR4 |
| |
| Institution: | 1. INSEAD, Boulevard de Constance, Fontainebleau 77305, France;2. Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, Rotterdam 3062PA, The Netherlands;3. Nutrition Research at the Research Institute of Child Nutrition Dortmund, Heinstück 11, D-44225 Dortmund, Germany;4. Life & Brain Center, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany;5. Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, 91 boulevard de l''Hôpital, Paris 75013, France |
| |
| Abstract: | This is a critique of ESARR4 and its main supporting documents. ESARR4 is the Eurocontrol Safety Regulatory Requirement Number 4 Eurocontrol safety regulatory requirement ESARR4, Edition 1.0., Eurocontrol, Safety Regulation Commission, Brussels, 2001]: ‘Risk assessment and mitigation in ATM’, ATM standing for Air Traffic Management. It is demonstrated that ESARR4 and its supporting documents are defective. There is a lack of clarity about responsibilities for ATM safety. The claims ESARR4 etc. make for its proposed methodologies are overstated—not supported by sound evidence from real world hazard analysis. Serious negative effects from this defective document include mis-allocation of scarce safety resources and the diversion of attention away from real safety improvements—wasteful of regulators’ and managers’ time. Suggestions are made for repairing these deficiencies. The most important underlying change would be a refocusing on practical safety assessment based on methods that have already demonstrated their merits. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
