Policy and reality of Environmentally Sensitive Areas in Whitman County,Washington, USA |
| |
Authors: | Michael D. Jennings John P. Reganold |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Program in Environmental Science and Regional Planning, Washington State University, 99164 Pullman, Washington, USA;(2) Department of Agronomy and Soils, Washington State University, 99164 Pullman, Washington, USA |
| |
Abstract: | The Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) promotes the conservation of natural resources through procedural review of proposed actions which may impact natural systems. There are, however, many actions specifically exempt from the SEPA review process. Since many exempt actions could have significant adverse effects on natural resources at one location and not another, the SEPA statute contains a provision that enables local governments to designate Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs). Within the ESAs, these potentially adverse activities are subject to SEPA review. Local governments have complete control over the exact definition of the ESA criteria and the types of local projects exempt from SEPA. Whitman County, the most productive wheat-producing county in Washington, has recognized the need for conservation of its natural resources in its comprehensive plan but has not implemented the ESA provision. A representative watershed within Whitman County was used as a case study to identify areas which would qualify for ESA status. In these areas, specific soil, water, and biological characteristics or resources were identified as sensitive to certain common land uses. Significant differences were found between state and county policies regarding ESAs and actual conditions within the watershed. It may be more effective for the state to manage ESAs on a consistent and regional basis. |
| |
Keywords: | Environmentally Sensitive Areas Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Land-use planning Environmental inventory |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|