首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

对“撞了白撞”问题的思考
引用本文:蔡果,熊灿.对“撞了白撞”问题的思考[J].中国安全科学学报,2004,14(7):109-112.
作者姓名:蔡果  熊灿
作者单位:1. 湖南公安高等专科学校交通管理系
2. 湖南师范大学法学院
摘    要:在《中华人民共和国道路交通安全法》公布前后有关“撞了白撞”被否决的宣传对交通安全不利。“撞了白撞”的演绎存在片面性 ,“撞了白撞”被否决的宣传不符合自然科学规律 ,存在理论上的误区。人们应该清楚的认识到 :获得交通事故损害赔偿并非获得了交通安全保障 ;行人、非机动车等交通“弱者”在一定条件下可转化为交通“强者”。对法律、法规的宣传 ,既要讲究法律原则和社会道德准则 ,也要讲究科学性。

关 键 词:交通  交通事故  交通安全法  事故责任  赔偿责任  宣传
修稿时间:2004年3月1日

Ponder over "Hit-and-Run"
CAI Guo,Prof..Ponder over "Hit-and-Run"[J].China Safety Science Journal,2004,14(7):109-112.
Authors:CAI Guo  Prof
Abstract:Around the promulgation of The Road Traffic Safety Code of the P. R. China, the propaganda about the overruled saying that the driver will not be responsible for knocking down people during the green light is detrimental to traffic safety. The deduction of “hit-and-run” is one-sided and theoretically fallacious, and the propaganda of vetoing “hit-and-run” does not conform to natural science law. People should realize carefully that getting traffic accident compensation is not equal to getting traffic safety guarantee; pedestrian, non-motor vehicle these traffic “disadvantageous ones” could change into “advantageous ones” under certain condition. When propagating the law and regulations, one should stress not only the law principle and social moral code, but also the science nature.
Keywords:Traffic  Traffic accident  Traffic safety code  Responsibility for accident Liability to pay compensation  Propaganda
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号