Is environmental research and development on the right track? Australian examples

Summary The development products of environmental research lag behind in Australia. The conventional technology transfer model may not apply where environmental research, especially in the social sciences, is still seen as marginal to society. Pragmatic planning is needed for strategic security in times of trouble ahead. Cultural alignment with technological advance allows seduction by laboratories, white gladiatorial coats and expensive equipment imparting high credibility. A correctness for research futures disallows more radical pathways by the use of profit watchers, waste watch committees, technocrats and masculinist political views.A new protocol for environmental research and development calls for less complacency, scrutiny of political and military investment in nuclear futures, greater public policy analysis of issues such as pesticides in Australia's cotton industry, more attention to natural systems thresholds, radical review of social mores, more flexible management systems and closer links between strategic land use and environmental planning.She currently works for the New South Wales Department of Water Resources as a Senior Executive Officer. She has published widely on environmental policy analysis and water planning, and is a Director of Australia's National Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation.