首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

西北干旱区流域水污染特征与控制策略—以宁夏清水河流域为例
引用本文:马玉珅,朱翔,彭福全,等.西北干旱区流域水污染特征与控制策略:以宁夏清水河流域为例[J].环境工程技术学报,2022,12(5):1369-1377 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210323
作者姓名:马玉珅  朱翔  彭福全  庞晴晴  倪利晓  杜鹏
作者单位:1.生态环境部南京环境科学研究所;2.河海大学环境学院;3.宁夏回族自治区生态环境厅
基金项目:国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2018ZX07208-006-004);;国家自然科学基金面上项目(51778265);
摘    要:

以宁夏境内黄河最大的一级支流清水河流域为例,分析重点断面水质、水环境容量及各控制单元污染负荷特征,并提出有针对性的污染控制策略。结果表明:2015—2018年清水河三营国控断面水质无法稳定达到GB 3838—2002《地表水环境质量标准》Ⅳ类水质标准,泉眼山断面化学需氧量(COD)存在超Ⅳ类水质标准风险。流域水环境容量COD为592.83~1 238.25 t/a,氨氮为51.99~193.60 t/a,总磷(TP)为5.02~12.85 t/a;流域平水期污染负荷入河量COD为15 661.1 t/a,氨氮为1 670.2 t/a,TP为784.5 t/a,分别是平水期水环境容量(COD为940.57 t/a,氨氮为114.64 t/a,TP为8.81 t/a)的16、14和89倍。固原控制单元单位面积污染负荷入河量最高(COD为3.04 t/a,氨氮为0.22 t/a,TP为0.06 t/a),工业源与城镇生活源污染问题突出,中卫控制单元总污染负荷入河量最高(COD为 6 738.45 t/a,氨氮为868.88 t/a,TP为218.12 t/a),城镇生活源污染较严重,而吴忠控制单元禽畜养殖污染较严重。基于水质目标和各单元的污染特征,建议固原控制单元加强工业企业污水回收利用、提高城镇污水处理能力,中卫控制单元重点关注污水收集处理设施建设与改造升级,吴忠控制单元在规模化养殖场推行禽畜粪污集中处理与回用。



关 键 词:黄河上游   污染负荷   水环境容量   流域污染治理   清水河流域
收稿时间:2021-07-13

Water pollution characteristics and control strategies in arid areas of Northwest China: a case study of Qingshui River Basin in Ningxia
MA Y S,ZHU X,PENG F Q,et al.Water pollution characteristics and control strategies in arid areas of Northwest China: a case study of Qingshui River Basin in Ningxia[J].Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology,2022,12(5):1369-1377 doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.20210323
Authors:MA Yushen  ZHU Xiang  PENG Fuquan  PANG Qingqing  NI Lixiao  DU Peng
Affiliation:1. Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Minstry of Ecology and Environment;2. College of Environment, Hohai University;3. Department of Ecology and Environment of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region
Abstract:Taking Qingshui River Basin, the largest first-level tributary of the Yellow River in Ningxia, as an example, the water quality, water environmental capacity and the characteristics of pollution loads of each control unit in key sections were analyzed, and targeted pollution control strategies were proposed. The results showed that the water quality of Sanying national control section of the Qingshui River in 2015-2018 could not stably reach the Class Ⅳ water quality standard of Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water (GB 3838-2002), and the chemical oxygen demand (COD) of Quanyanshan Section was at risk of exceeding the Class Ⅳ water quality standard. The water environmental capacity of the basin was 592.83-1 238.25 t/a for COD, 51.99-193.60 t/a for ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) and 5.02-12.85 t/a for total phosphorus (TP). The pollution load into the Qingshui River of the basin was 15 661.1 t/a for COD, 1 670.2 t/a for NH3-N and 784.5 t/a for TP in normal water period, which was 16, 14 and 89 times of the water environmental capacity (COD 940.57 t/a, NH3-N 114.64 t/a, TP 8.81 t/a). The pollution load per unit area in Guyuan City was the highest (COD 3.04 t/a, NH3-N 0.22 t/a, TP 0.06 t/a), with outstanding problems of industrial pollution load and urban living pollution. The total pollution load in Zhongwei City control unit into the river was the highest (COD 6 738.45 t/a, NH3-N 868.88 t/a, TP 218.12 t/a), with relatively serious urban living source pollution, while Wuzhong City control unit had relatively heavy poultry-farming pollution. Based on the water quality targets and the pollution characteristics of each unit, it was recommended that the wastewater recycling and utilization of industrial enterprises be strengthened and the urban wastewater treatment capacity be improved in Guyuan City control unit; the construction, transformation and upgrading of sewage collection and treatment facilities be focused on Zhongwei City control unit; and the centralized treatment and reuse of livestock manure in large-scale farms be implemented in Wuzhong City control unit.
Keywords:upper reaches of the Yellow River  pollution load  water environmental capacity  watershed pollution control  Qingshui River Basin
点击此处可从《环境工程技术学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境工程技术学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号