首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Grab versus composite sampling: A primer for the manager and engineer
Authors:David J Schaeffer  Harold W Kerster  Konanur G Janardan
Institution:(1) Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, 62706 Springfield, Illinois;(2) Environmental Studies Center, California State University, 95819 Sacramento, California;(3) Math Systems, Sangamon State University, 62708 Springfield, Illinois
Abstract:Effluent subsamples are usually aggregated into flow or time proportional samples before analysis. Although this provides information on average process conditions, that on process variability is lost by compositing. Fisher's information is defined and used to estimate the loss due to compositing. The results of simulations based on parameters derived from actual waste streams support the fact that random grabs serve as well as composite samples for monitoring purposes. These findings favor changes in regulatory practice to allow compliance to be demonstrated by grab sample averages. Reporting requirements based on moving averages are shown to be inferior to those based on averages taken over nonoverlapping time periods.
Keywords:Grab and composite sampling  sample mean and variance  economics  regulations  pollution
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号