首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Providing the Spark: Impact of financial incentives on battery electric vehicle adoption
Institution:1. MIT Energy Initiative (MITEI), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, United States;2. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), 15013 Denver West Parkway, Golden, CO 80401, United States;1. MIT Energy Initiative (MITEI), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, United States;2. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), 15013 Denver West Parkway, Golden, CO 80401, United States;1. University of South Carolina, 1014 Greene St, Columbia, SC 29208, United States;2. University of California, Los Angeles, United States;1. Plug-in Hybrid & Electric Vehicle Center, Sustainable Transportation Energy Pathways, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, 1590 Tilia St., Davis, CA 95616, United States;2. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, Republic of Korea;3. Plug-in Hybrid & Electric Vehicle Center, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, 1590 Tilia St., Davis, CA 95616, United States;1. The Swedish National Board of Housing, Building and Planning, Drottninggatan 18, 371 31 Karlskrona, Sweden;2. University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics, Vasagatan 1, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden
Abstract:To overcome adoption barriers and promote battery electric vehicles (BEVs) as an energy efficient consumer transportation option, a number of states offer subsidies to consumers for BEVs. We use a national data set of vehicle registrations and state-level financial incentives to assess the impact of vehicle purchase subsidies on adoption using both difference-in-differences and synthetic controls methods. We find that incentives offered as direct purchase rebates generate increased levels of new BEV registrations at a rate of approximately 8 percent per thousand dollars of incentive offered. Between 2011 and 2015, vehicle rebate incentives are associated with an increase in overall BEV registrations of approximately 11 percent. Our findings indicate incentives offered as state income tax credits do not have a statistically significant effect on BEV adoptions, though we caution this may be a result of limited temporal variation in BEV incentives across our sample. Responses to rebate incentives do not differ significantly by the make of the vehicle purchased (i.e., Tesla and non-Tesla vehicles). We combine our results with recent assessments of marginal environmental costs of electric vehicle charging and measure net welfare effects of BEV subsidy programs. Our analysis indicates these programs are not welfare-improving if only considering benefits associated with avoided emissions. Additional benefits associated with long-term market growth, production cost savings, network externalities, or accelerated innovation could substantially impact the net welfare outcomes.
Keywords:Electric vehicles  Tax incentives  Rebates  Technology adoption  Q55  L98  O38  H71
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号