Prediction of responsibility for drivers and riders involved in injury road crashes |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Univ Lyon, Université Lyon 1, IFSTTAR, UMRESTTE UMR_T 9405, F-69675 Lyon, France;2. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France;1. University of Paris VIII and French Institute of Science and Technology for Transport, Development and Networks (Ifsttar), AME-LPC, 25 allée des Marronniers, CS 90508, 78008 VERSAILLES Cedex, France;2. Federal University of Paraná, Department of Psychology, Praça Santos Andrade, 50 – Prédio Histórico da UFPR, Sala 214, CEP 80020-300 Curitiba, Brazil;3. Ifsttar, AME-LPC, 25 allée des Marronniers, CS 90508, 78008 VERSAILLES Cedex, France;1. The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, TN, United States;2. Square, Inc., San Francisco, CA, United States;3. Clemson University, SC, United States;4. Wells Fargo, San Francisco, CA, United States;1. Center for Transportation Research, University of Tennessee – Knoxville, 600 Henley Street, 309 Conference Center Building, Knoxville, TN 37996-4133, USA;2. Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA 30030, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Introduction: Responsibility analysis allows the evaluation of crash risk factors from crash data only, but requires a reliable responsibility assessment. The aim of the present study is to predict expert responsibility attribution (considered as a gold-standard) from explanatory variables available in crash data routinely recorded by the police, according to a data-driven process with explicit rules. Method: Driver responsibility was assessed by experts using all information contained in police reports for a sample of about 5000 injury crashes that occurred in France in 2011. Three statistical methods were used to predict expert responsibility attribution: logistic regression with L1 penalty, random forests, and boosting. Potential predictors of expert attribution referred to inappropriate driver actions and to external conditions at the time of the crash. Logistic regression was chosen to construct a score to assess responsibility for drivers and riders in crashes involving one or more motor vehicles, or involving a cyclist or pedestrian. Results: Cross-validation showed that our tool can predict expert responsibility assessments on new data sets. In addition, responsibility analyses performed using either the expert responsibility or our predicted responsibility return similar odds ratios. Our scoring process can then be used to reliably assess responsibility based on national police report databases, provided that they include the information needed to construct the score. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|