首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Neighborhood effects in the Brazilian Amazônia: Protected areas and deforestation
Institution:1. Université Felix Houphouët Boigny, Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire;2. Economic Development Initiatives (EDI) Limited, High Wycombe, United Kingdom;3. Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, IRD, CERDI, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France;4. African Development Bank (AfDB), Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire;1. School of Environmental and Rural Studies, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Colombia;2. Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, United States;3. School of Economics and Center for the Study of Security and Drugs (CESED), Universidad de Los Andes, Colombia;1. Pós-Graduação Centro de Ciência do Sistema Terrestre, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, Avenida dos Astronautas, 1.758, Sala 1, 1° andar, Jardim da Granja, São José dos Campos, SP, 12227-010, Brazil;2. Centro Regional da Amazônia, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, Parque de Ciência e Tecnologia do Guamá, Avenida Perimetral, 2651, Sala 203, 20 andar, Belém, Pará, 66077-830, Brazil;3. Divisão de Processamento de Imagens (DPI), Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, Avenida dos Astronautas, 1.758, Sala 45, Piso Superior, SERE II, Jardim da Granja, São José dos Campos, SP, 12227-010, Brazil;4. Centro de Ciência do Sistema Terrestre, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, Avenida dos Astronautas, 1.758, Sala 12, 3° andar, Jardim da Granja, São José dos Campos, SP, 12227-010, Brazil;1. School of Economics, CERDI UMR CNRS 6587, University of Clermont Auvergne, 65 bd François Mitterrand, F 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France;2. BETA, Université de Lorraine, INRA, AgroParisTech, 54000, Nancy, France;3. Climate Economics Chair, Paris, France;4. The World Bank, Lomé, Togo;1. Université de Lorraine, Université de Strasbourg, AgroParisTech, CNRS, INRA, BETA, 54000, Nancy, France;2. Economic Development Initiatives (EDI) Limited, High Wycombe, United Kingdom;3. Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, IRD, CERDI, 63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France;4. African Development Bank (AfDB), Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire;1. Economics and Finance Department, Salisbury University, Salisbury, MD, 21801, USA;2. Environmental Studies Department, Salisbury University, Salisbury, MD, 21801, USA;1. Resources for the Future, 1616 P Street, Washington, DC 20036, United States;2. Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, United States;3. Environment for Development Center for Central America (EfD-CA), Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, CATIE 7170, Cartago, Turrialba 30501, Costa Rica
Abstract:This article investigates whether protected areas are efficient instruments against deforestation in the Brazilian Amazônia. A Dynamic Spatial Durbin Model taking into account both the location bias and the spatial spillover effects between municipalities allows to assess the impact of the different types of protected areas (integral protected areas, sustainable protected areas and indigenous lands) on deforestation. We show that deforestation decisions are strategic complements. The econometric results differ according to the type of protected area. It is shown that: i) integral protected areas and indigenous lands allow for reducing deforestation; ii) sustainable use areas do not help to reduce deforestation; and iii) the spillover effects generated by integral protected areas and indigenous lands lead a reduction in deforestation in their vicinity. A 10% increase in the surface area of integral protected areas (indigenous lands) allows an estimated 9.32 sq. km (10.08 sq. km) of avoided deforestation.
Keywords:Protected areas  Deforestation  Spatial econometrics  Brazil  Amazônia  C23  Q24  Q28  Q57
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号