A comparison of numerical methods for solving the advection equation |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow 101000, Russia;2. Department of Mathematics, North Carolina State University, Box 8205, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA;3. School of Mathematical Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel;1. Institut des Molécules et Matériaux du Mans (IMMM) - UMR 6283 CNRS, Le Mans Université, Avenue Olivier Messiaen, 72085 Le Mans Cedex 9, France;2. LPSC, Université Grenoble-Alpes, CNRS/IN2P3, 53 rue des Martyrs, 38026 Grenoble, France;1. Bolyai Institute, University of Szeged, Aradi vértanúk tere 1, 6720 Szeged, Hungary;2. Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands |
| |
Abstract: | Six algorithms for solving the advection equation have been compared as to their accuracy, speed and storage requirements, the purpose being to determine the suitability of the algorithms for use in photochemical grid models. The algorithms tested are a flux-correction method, a multidimensional fluxcorrection method, an orthogonal-collocation method, a second-moment method, a pseudospectral method and a chapeau-function method. For some of these, more than one variant of the method has been examined. Also, some improvements are suggested in the second-moment method. The test problem was the rotation of a hill of concentration in a two-dimensional, circular velocity field, and the methods were tested at three or four time steps (Courant numbers). The flux-correction and orthogonal-collocation methods are the least accurate and would not be good choices for photochemical models. The pseudospectral method is the most accurate, but it and the second-moment method require the longest execution time. The chapeau-function and multidimensional flux-correction methods appear the most appropriate for photochemical grid models. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|